Trial reportComputational and mathematical methods in medicine2022
Clinical Efficacy of Ulinastatin Combined with Meglumine Adenosine Cyclophosphate in the Treatment of Acute Myocardial Infarction.
Trial report in Computational and mathematical methods in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Recombinant human urinary trypsin inhibitor improves the immunological function of splenic dendritic cells in mice with acute lung injury.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
- Retracted: Clinical Efficacy of Ulinastatin Combined with Meglumine Adenosine Cyclophosphate in the Treatment of Acute Myocardial Infarction.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2022-11-23Concerns/Issues about Peer Review · Investigation by Journal/Publisher ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ulinastatin, a common adjuvant drug in the clinical treatment of acute circulatory failure, has a good effect on various inflammatory diseases. In this study, we aim to explore the clinical efficacy of ulinastatin combined with meglumine adenosine cyclophosphate in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and its effect on cardiac function and endothelial function of patients. 100 AMI patients treated in our hospital (February 2020-October 2020) were randomly chosen and divided into group J and group Q, with 50 cases in each group. Group Q was treated with meglumine adenosine cyclophosphate only, while group J was treated with ulinastatin combined with meglumine adenosine cyclophosphate to compare the treatment efficiency, cardiac structure indexes, cardiac systolic function, blood lipid levels, vascular endothelial function, QLI (quality of life) scores, BI indexes, and FMA (motor function) scores between the two groups. The treatment efficiency, QLI score, BI index, and FMA score in group J were notably higher compared with group Q (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.