Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35481554›Full record

Observational studyClinical cardiology2022

Safety of ACEi and ARB in COVID-19 management: A retrospective analysis.

Sabina Kumar, Mastaneh Nikravesh, Umeh Chukwuemeka, Michael Randazzo, Peter Flores, Prithi Choday, Ajith Raja, Mahendra Aseri, Shah Shivang, Sumanta Chaudhuri and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Clinical cardiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sabina KumarDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hemet Global Medical Center, Hemet, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3851-9142
Mastaneh NikraveshDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hemet Global Medical Center, Hemet, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2990-7960
Umeh ChukwuemekaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hemet Global Medical Center, Hemet, California, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6574-8595
Michael RandazzoDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hemet Global Medical Center, Hemet, California, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2365-124X
Peter FloresDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hemet Global Medical Center, Hemet, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5364-4243
Prithi ChodayDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hemet Global Medical Center, Hemet, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2785-0956
Ajith RajaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hemet Global Medical Center, Hemet, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5893-6336
Mahendra AseriDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hemet Global Medical Center, Hemet, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0726-9550
Shah ShivangDivison of Cardiology, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6518-3360
Sumanta ChaudhuriDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hemet Global Medical Center, Hemet, California, USA.
Pranav BarveDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hemet Global Medical Center, Hemet, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3490-1451
University of California, Riverside · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND &

aimsSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV2)is a highly contagious virus that has infected 260 million individuals since December 2019. The severity of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) depends upon the complex interplay between viral factors and the host's inflammatory response, which can trigger a cascadeeventually leading to multiorgan failure. There is contradictory evidence that angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACEi) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) may affect mortality in patients with severe COVID-19, theoretically due to interaction with the bradykinin pathway. Therefore, we aim to explore the association between ACEi and ARB use and mortality in severe SARS-CoV2 infection.Severe acute respiratory yndrome with coronavirus (SARS-CoV2) is a highly contagious virus that has infected 260 million individuals since December 2019. The severity of COVID-19 depends upon the complex interplay between viral factors and the host's inflammatory response, which can trigger a cascadeeventually leading to multiorgan failure. There is contradictory evidence that angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACEi) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) may affect mortality in patients with severe COVID-19, theoretically due to interaction with the bradykinin pathway. Therefore, we aim to explore the association between ACEi and ARB use and mortality in severe SARS-CoV2 infection. MATERIALS & METHODOLOGY: This multicenter retrospective observational study enrolled 2935 COVID-19 patients admitted at six hospitals in Southern California, USA, between March 2020 and August 2021. Our primary outcome was the association of pre-hospital use of ACEi and ARB on in-hospital mortality in COVID-19 patients. First, relevant deidentified patient data were extracted using an SQL program from the electronic medical record. Then, a bivariate analysis of the relationship between ACEi and ARB use and different study variables using χ

resultsOf the 2935 patients in the study, hypertension was present in 40.6%, and congestive heart failure in 13.8%. ACEi and ARB were used by 17.5% and 11.3% of patients, respectively, with 28.8% of patients on either medication. After adjusting for confounding variables in the multivariate analysis, the use of ACEi (HR: 1.226, 95% CI: 0.989-1.520) or ARB (HR: 0.923, 95% CI: 0.701-1.216) was not independently associated with increased mortality.

conclusionOur results are consistent with the clinical guidelines and position statements per the International Society of Hypertension, that there is no indication to stop the use of ACEi/ARB in COVID-19 patients.

Indexed as

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAngiotensin Receptor AntagonistsCOVID-19HypertensionHumansRetrospective StudiesSARS-CoV-2Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAngiotensin Receptor AntagonistsACEiARBCOVID-19hypertensionmortalitysafety

Identifiers

PMID35481554
PMCPMC9110920
OpenAlexW4225109418

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.