Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35485457›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2022

Dynamics and Impacts of Transposable Element Proliferation in the Drosophila nasuta Species Group Radiation.

Kevin H-C Wei, Dat Mai, Kamalakar Chatla, Doris Bachtrog

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Transposable element and host silencing activity in gigantic genomes.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kevin H-C WeiDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1694-9582
Dat MaiDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.
Kamalakar ChatlaDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.
Doris BachtrogDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9724-9467
University of California, Berkeley · US

Funding

The formation of Heterochromatin on evolving Y chromosomesR01GM101255 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI Doris Bachtrog · 2015 to 2026
$4.9M
Aging and the evolution of the sex-specific chromatin structure in DrosophilaR56AG057029 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI BACHTROG, DORIS · 2017 to 2017
$683k
Molecular and evolutionary characterization of male recombination and its reversal in the D. nasuta species subgroupK99GM137041 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI WEI, HENG CHIN KEVIN · 2020 to 2021
$185k
NIA NIH HHS R56 AG057029NIGMS NIH HHS K99 GM137041NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM101255
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transposable element (TE) mobilization is a constant threat to genome integrity. Eukaryotic organisms have evolved robust defensive mechanisms to suppress their activity, yet TEs can escape suppression and proliferate, creating strong selective pressure for host defense to adapt. This genomic conflict fuels a never-ending arms race that drives the rapid evolution of TEs and recurrent positive selection of genes involved in host defense; the latter has been shown to contribute to postzygotic hybrid incompatibility. However, how TE proliferation impacts genome and regulatory divergence remains poorly understood. Here, we report the highly complete and contiguous (N50 = 33.8-38.0 Mb) genome assemblies of seven closely related Drosophila species that belong to the nasuta species group-a poorly studied group of flies that radiated in the last 2 My. We constructed a high-quality de novo TE library and gathered germline RNA-seq data, which allowed us to comprehensively annotate and compare TE insertion patterns between the species, and infer the evolutionary forces controlling their spread. We find a strong negative association between TE insertion frequency and expression of genes nearby; this likely reflects survivor bias from reduced fitness impact of TEs inserting near lowly expressed, nonessential genes, with limited TE-induced epigenetic silencing. Phylogenetic analyses of insertions of 147 TE families reveal that 53% of them show recent amplification in at least one species. The most highly amplified TE is a nonautonomous DNA element (Drosophila INterspersed Element; DINE) which has gone through multiple bouts of expansions with thousands of full-length copies littered throughout each genome. Across all TEs, we find that TEs expansions are significantly associated with high expression in the expanded species consistent with suppression escape. Thus, whereas horizontal transfer followed by the invasion of a naïve genome has been highlighted to explain the long-term survival of TEs, our analysis suggests that evasion of host suppression of resident TEs is a major strategy to persist over evolutionary times. Altogether, our results shed light on the heterogenous and context-dependent nature in which TEs affect gene regulation and the dynamics of rampant TE proliferation amidst a recently radiated species group.

Indexed as

DNA Transposable ElementsDrosophilaAnimalsCell ProliferationEvolution, MolecularHumansPhylogenyDNA Transposable ElementsDrosophilaepigenetic suppressiontransposable elements

Identifiers

PMID35485457
PMCPMC9075770
OpenAlexW4225131103

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.