Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35494026›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

Development and Validation of a Four Adenosine-to-Inosine RNA Editing Site-Relevant Prognostic Signature for Assessing Survival in Breast Cancer Patients.

Jian Wan, Shizhen Chen, Anqin Zhang, Yiting Liu, Yangyang Zhang, Qinghua Li, Ziqi Yu, Yuwei Wan, Lei Yang, Qi Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jian WanThe First Affiliated Hospital, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Shizhen ChenThe State Key Lab of Respiratory Disease, Institute of Public Health, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Anqin ZhangBreast Disease Center, Guangdong Women and Children Hospital, Guangzhou, China.
Yiting LiuBreast Disease Center, Guangdong Women and Children Hospital, Guangzhou, China.
Yangyang ZhangBreast Disease Center, Guangdong Women and Children Hospital, Guangzhou, China.
Qinghua LiBreast Disease Center, Guangdong Women and Children Hospital, Guangzhou, China.
Ziqi YuThe State Key Lab of Respiratory Disease, Institute of Public Health, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Yuwei WanThe State Key Lab of Respiratory Disease, Institute of Public Health, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Lei YangThe State Key Lab of Respiratory Disease, Institute of Public Health, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Qi WangThe First Affiliated Hospital, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Adenosine-to-inosine RNA editing (ATIRE) is increasingly being used to characterize cancer. However, no studies have been conducted to identify an ATIRE signature for predicting cancer survival. Methods: Breast cancer (BRCA) samples with ATIRE profiles from The Cancer Genome Atlas were divided into training (n = 452) and internal validation cohorts (n = 311), and 197 additional BRCA patients were recruited as an external validation cohort. The ATIRE signature for BRCA overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were identified using forest algorithm analysis and experimentally verified by direct sequencing. An ATIRE-based risk score (AIRS) was established with these selected ATIRE sites. Significantly prognostic factors were incorporated to generate a nomogram that was evaluated using Harrell's C-index and calibration plot for all cohorts. Results: Seven ATIRE sites were revealed to be associated with both BRCA OS and DFS, of which four sites were experimentally confirmed. Patients with high AIRS displayed a higher risk of death than those with low AIRS in the training (hazard ratio (HR) = 3.142, 95%CI = 1.932-5.111), internal validation (HR = 2.097, 95%CI = 1.123-3.914), and external validation cohorts (HR = 2.680, 95%CI = 1.000-7.194). A similar hazard effect of high AIRS on DFS was also observed. The nomogram yielded Harrell's C-indexes of 0.816 (95%CI = 0.784-0.847), 0.742 (95%CI = 0.684-0.799), and 0.869 (95%CI = 0.835-0.902) for predicting OS and 0.767 (95%CI = 0.708-0.826), 0.684 (95%CI = 0.605-0.763), and 0.635 (95%CI = 0.566-0.705) for predicting DFS in the three cohorts. Conclusion: AIRS nomogram could help to predict OS and DFS of patients with BRCA.

Indexed as

A-to-I RNA editingbreast cancerdisease-free survivalnomogramoverall survival

Identifiers

PMID35494026
PMCPMC9039306

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.