Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35499803›Full record

SynthesisJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2024

Is poor sleep quality associated with poor neurocognitive outcome in cancer survivors? A systematic review.

A Josephine Drijver, Quirien Oort, René Otten, Jaap C Reijneveld, Martin Klein

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

A Josephine DrijverDepartment of Neurology and Brain Tumor Center Amsterdam at Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Quirien OortDepartment of Neurology and Brain Tumor Center Amsterdam at Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
René OttenMedical Library, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jaap C ReijneveldDepartment of Neurology and Brain Tumor Center Amsterdam at Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Martin KleinDepartment of Medical Psychology and Brain Tumor Center Amsterdam at Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. m.klein@amsterdamumc.nl.ORCID 0000-0001-5553-7911
Amsterdam Neuroscience · NLAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCancer-related neurocognitive impairment and poor sleep are prevalent in cancer survivors and have a negative impact on their quality of life. This systematic review studies the association between sleep disturbance and neurocognitive functioning, as well as the potential positive effects of sleep interventions on neurocognitive functioning in cancer survivors. In addition, we aimed at determining the potential positive effects of sleep interventions on neurocognitive functioning in this population.

methodsFollowing PRISMA guidelines for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses, a comprehensive PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, and CINAHL search was performed. Inclusion criteria were adult cancer survivors, self-reported or objective measures of neurocognitive functioning and sleep quality, or reports on the association between sleep and neurocognitive functioning.

resultsOf the 4,547 records retrieved, 17 studies were retained for this review. Twelve studies were correlational, and five reported on interventions aimed at improving sleep quality. All studies that included self-reported neurocognitive functioning found that poorer sleep was associated with worse neurocognitive functioning. In four out of eight studies, poorer sleep was associated with objective neurocognitive impairment. Three out of five interventional studies showed neurocognitive functioning improved with improved sleep.

conclusionsWhile poor sleep in cancer survivors is associated with self-reported neurocognitive impairment, the association between poor sleep and objective neurocognitive impairment is less evident. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: It is important that care providers are aware of the association between sleep and neurocognitive functioning and that improving sleep quality can be a way to decrease neurocognitive impairment in cancer survivors.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsNeoplasmsSleep QualitySleep Wake DisordersCognitive DysfunctionHumansNeurocognitive DisordersQuality of LifeCancer survivorsNeurocognitive functioningQuality of lifeSleep

Identifiers

PMID35499803
PMCPMC10960780
OpenAlexW4225263174

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.