Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35501321›Full record

ReviewNPJ biofilms and microbiomes2022

The right bug in the right place: opportunities for bacterial vaginosis treatment.

Shengru Wu, Luisa Warchavchik Hugerth, Ina Schuppe-Koistinen, Juan Du

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in NPJ biofilms and microbiomes, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shengru WuCentre for Translational Microbiome Research (CTMR), Department of Microbiology, Tumor, and Cell Biology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-1046-3477
Luisa Warchavchik HugerthCentre for Translational Microbiome Research (CTMR), Department of Microbiology, Tumor, and Cell Biology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Ina Schuppe-KoistinenCentre for Translational Microbiome Research (CTMR), Department of Microbiology, Tumor, and Cell Biology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-1423-3089
Juan DuCentre for Translational Microbiome Research (CTMR), Department of Microbiology, Tumor, and Cell Biology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. juan.du@ki.se.ORCID 0000-0001-7649-9571

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is a condition in which the vaginal microbiome presents an overgrowth of obligate and facultative anaerobes, which disturbs the vaginal microbiome balance. BV is a common and recurring vaginal infection among women of reproductive age and is associated with adverse health outcomes and a decreased quality of life. The current recommended first-line treatment for BV is antibiotics, despite the high recurrence rate. Live biopharmaceutical products/probiotics and vaginal microbiome transplantation (VMT) have also been tested in clinical trials for BV. In this review, we discuss the advantages and challenges of current BV treatments and interventions. Furthermore, we provide our understanding of why current clinical trials with probiotics have had mixed results, which is mainly due to not administering the correct bacteria to the correct body site. Here, we propose a great opportunity for large clinical trials with probiotic strains isolated from the vaginal tract (e.g., Lactobacillus crispatus) and administered directly into the vagina after pretreatment.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaProbioticsVaginosis, BacterialBacteriaFemaleHumansQuality of LifeVagina

Identifiers

PMID35501321
PMCPMC9061781

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.