Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35505793›Full record

ArticleHealth and technology2022

Evaluating value mediation in patients with chronic low-back pain using virtual reality: contributions for empirical research in Value Sensitive Design.

Merlijn Smits, Harry van Goor, Jan-Willem Kallewaard, Peter-Paul Verbeek, Geke D S Ludden

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health and technology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Merlijn SmitsRadboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Radboud university medical center, 116, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, P.O. Box 9101, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2292-6950
Harry van GoorRadboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Radboud university medical center, 116, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, P.O. Box 9101, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0323-4876
Jan-Willem KallewaardDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Rijnstate Hospital, Wagnerlaan 55, 6800 TA Arnhem, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7681-1796
Peter-Paul VerbeekFaculty of Behavioural, Management and Social Sciences, University of Twente, Drienerlolaan 5, 7522 NB Enschede, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9861-4091
Geke D S LuddenFaculty of Engineering Technology, University of Twente, Drienerlolaan 5, 7522 NB Enschede, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4508-9865

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Value Sensitive Design (VSD) is the most well-known method to consider values in design. It consists of three iterative phases of investigation: conceptual, empirical, and technical. Although the approach is promising, the role of empirical research remains unclear. We address two opportunities for extending the role of empirical research in VSD. First, we argue that empirical research enables us to identify values in context. Second, we explain that empirical research enables us to anticipate how technology mediates the values of users. We make our point by means of an empirical study in a real-life controlled experimental context into the value mediation of virtual reality (VR) in patients with chronic low-back pain. Using value-oriented semi-structured interviews with twenty patients, we first analyze what values these patients consider important, and how the values are experienced. The second set of interviews held after all patients used VR four weeks at home, aims to provide insight into value changes as mediated by VR. We end the article by a comparison of our empirical results with previous, often speculative, literature into values in VR. We show that empirical research benefits the VSD process by providing in-depth insight into the effects of context and technology on values and the ability to translate these insights into recommendations for more responsible design and implementation of the technology. Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12553-022-00671-w.

Indexed as

Chronic PainEmpirical researchVirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID35505793
PMCPMC9051502

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.