Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35506696›Full record

SynthesisTrauma, violence & abuse2023

The Measurement of Intimate Partner Violence Using International Classification of Diseases Diagnostic Codes: A Systematic Review.

Rebecca Rebbe, Avanti Adhia, Andrea Lane Eastman, May Chen, Jade Winn

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Trauma, violence & abuse, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A Decision-Making Framework for Selecting Intimate Partner Violence Measures in Health Research.Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rebecca RebbeSuzanne Dworak-Peck School of Social Work, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6759-1701
Avanti AdhiaHarborview Injury Prevention and Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3582-2990
Andrea Lane EastmanSuzanne Dworak-Peck School of Social Work, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
May ChenDivision of Violence Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6814-9819
Jade WinnUniversity of Southern California Libraries, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intimate partner violence (IPV) is challenging to measure yet systematic surveillance of IPV is critical to informing public health prevention and response efforts. Administrative medical data provide opportunities for such surveillance, and often use the International Classification of Diseases (ICD). The primary purpose of this systematic review was to document which ICD codes have been used in empirical literature to identify IPV, understand the justification used to select specific codes to develop IPV case definitions, and identify the data sources and types of research questions addressed by the existing literature. We searched 11 databases and of the initial 2182 results, 21 empirical studies from 2000 to 2020 met the study inclusion criteria including using ICD codes to measure IPV. The majority of these studies (90.5%) used either national samples of data or population-based administrative data from emergency departments (52.4%) or inpatient hospitalizations (38.1%). We found wide variation of ICD diagnostic codes to measure IPV and categorized the sets of codes used based on the number of codes. The most commonly used ICD-9 codes were E967.3, 995.81, 995.80, 995.85 and the most common ICD-10 codes were T74.1 and Z63.0. Few studies validated the ICD codes used to measure IPV. Most included studies (81.0%) answered epidemiological research questions. The current study provides suggestions for future research, including justifying the selection of ICD codes and providing a range of estimates based on narrow and broad sets of codes. Implications for policy and practice, including enhanced training for healthcare professionals in documenting IPV, are discussed.

Indexed as

International Classification of DiseasesIntimate Partner ViolenceEmergency Service, HospitalHumansdiagnostic codesinternational classification of diseasesintimate partner violencemeasurementsystematic reviewthe measurement of intimate partner violence using diagnostic codes

Identifiers

PMID35506696
PMCPMC10711693

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.