Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35508748›Full record

Trial reportObesity surgery2022

Intraperitoneal Instillation of Local Anesthetic (IPILA) in Bariatric Surgery and the Effect on Post-operative Pain Scores: a Randomized Control Trial.

Ramandeep Kaur, Alexa Seal, Igor Lemech, Oliver M Fisher, Nicholas Williams

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Obesity surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ramandeep KaurSchool of Medicine Sydney, Rural Clinical School (Wagga Wagga), The University of Notre Dame Australia, 40 Hardy Avenue, PO Box 5050, Wagga Wagga, NSW, 2650, Australia. ramandeepkaur3462@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-6382-9842
Alexa SealSchool of Medicine Sydney, Rural Clinical School (Wagga Wagga), The University of Notre Dame Australia, 40 Hardy Avenue, PO Box 5050, Wagga Wagga, NSW, 2650, Australia.
Igor LemechAnesthetic Department, Calvary Hospital Riverina, 26-36 Hardy Avenue, Wagga Wagga, NSW, 2650, Australia.
Oliver M FisherUpper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, St George Hospital, Gray St, Kogarah, NSW, 2217, Australia.
Nicholas WilliamsSchool of Medicine Sydney, Rural Clinical School (Wagga Wagga), The University of Notre Dame Australia, 40 Hardy Avenue, PO Box 5050, Wagga Wagga, NSW, 2650, Australia.
The University of Notre Dame Australia · AUCalvary Riverina Hospital · AUSt George Hospital · AUWagga Wagga Base Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEffective analgesia after bariatric procedures is vital as it can reduce post-operative opioid use. This leads to less nausea which may be associated with shorter post-operative length of stay (LOS). Understanding analgesic requirements in patients with obesity is important due to the varied physiology and increased number of comorbidities.

objectivesThe aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of intraperitoneal instillation of local anesthetic (IPILA) to reduce opioid requirements in patients undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery.

methodsA double-blinded randomized control trial was conducted to compare intraperitoneal instillation of ropivacaine to normal saline in 104 patients undergoing bariatric surgery. The primary endpoint was pain in recovery with secondary endpoints at 1, 2, 4, 6, 24, and 48 h post-operatively. Further endpoints were post-operative analgesic use and LOS. Safety endpoints included unexpected reoperation or readmission, complications, and mortality.

resultsThere were 54 patients in the placebo arm and 50 in the IPILA. Pain scores were significantly lower in the IPILA group both at rest (p = 0.04) and on movement (p = 0.02) in recovery with no difference seen at subsequent time points. Equally, IPILA was independently associated with reducing severe post-operative pain at rest and movement (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.28, 95% CI 0.11-0.69, p = 0.007 and aOR 0.25, 95% CI 0.09-0.62, p = 0.004, respectively). There was no significant difference in LOS, opioid use, antiemetic use, morbidity, or mortality between the intervention and placebo groups.

conclusionThe administration of ropivacaine intraperitoneally during laparoscopic bariatric surgery reduces post-operative pain in the recovery room but does not reduce opioid use nor LOS.

Indexed as

Bariatric SurgeryLaparoscopyObesity, MorbidAnalgesicsAnalgesics, OpioidAnesthetics, LocalDouble-Blind MethodHumansPostoperative PainRopivacaineAnalgesicsAnalgesics, OpioidAnesthetics, LocalRopivacaineBariatric surgeryIntraperitoneal instillationPost-operative painRopivacaine

Identifiers

PMID35508748
PMCPMC9276555
OpenAlexW4225419493

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.