Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35510704›Full record

ArticleProteins2022

Multi-state modeling of G-protein coupled receptors at experimental accuracy.

Lim Heo, Michael Feig

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proteins, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 120 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
120citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

120 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. GαNature communications · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Tyrosine kinases sample unique activation ensembles.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Bias in the AlphaFold3 prediction of ligand-induced domain motion in enzymes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

60 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lim HeoDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3153-2363
Michael FeigDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9380-6422

Funding

Modeling and dynamics of biomolecules on cellular scalesR35GM126948 · NIGMS · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Michael Feig · 2018 to 2026
$3.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM126948
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The family of G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) is one of the largest protein families in the human genome. GPCRs transduct chemical signals from extracellular to intracellular regions via a conformational switch between active and inactive states upon ligand binding. While experimental structures of GPCRs remain limited, high-accuracy computational predictions are now possible with AlphaFold2. However, AlphaFold2 only predicts one state and is biased toward either the active or inactive conformation depending on the GPCR class. Here, a multi-state prediction protocol is introduced that extends AlphaFold2 to predict either active or inactive states at very high accuracy using state-annotated templated GPCR databases. The predicted models accurately capture the main structural changes upon activation of the GPCR at the atomic level. For most of the benchmarked GPCRs (10 out of 15), models in the active and inactive states were closer to their corresponding activation state structures. Median RMSDs of the transmembrane regions were 1.12 Å and 1.41 Å for the active and inactive state models, respectively. The models were more suitable for protein-ligand docking than the original AlphaFold2 models and template-based models. Finally, our prediction protocol predicted accurate GPCR structures and GPCR-peptide complex structures in GPCR Dock 2021, a blind GPCR-ligand complex modeling competition. We expect that high accuracy GPCR models in both activation states will promote understanding in GPCR activation mechanisms and drug discovery for GPCRs. At the time, the new protocol paves the way towards capturing the dynamics of proteins at high-accuracy via machine-learning methods.

Indexed as

PeptidesReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledHumansLigandsProtein BindingProtein ConformationLigandsPeptidesReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledAlphaFoldcomputer-aided drug designGPCR activationG-protein coupled receptorsmulti-state modelingprotein dynamicsprotein structure prediction

Identifiers

PMID35510704
PMCPMC9561049

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.