Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35512957›Full record

ArticleJACC. Cardiovascular imaging2022

Radiomics-Based Precision Phenotyping Identifies Unstable Coronary Plaques From Computed Tomography Angiography.

Andrew Lin, Márton Kolossváry, Sebastien Cadet, Priscilla McElhinney, Markus Goeller, Donghee Han, Jeremy Yuvaraj, Nitesh Nerlekar, Piotr J Slomka, Mohamed Marwan and 5 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JACC. Cardiovascular imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
8.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Artificial Intelligence in Coronary Artery Interventions: Preprocedural Planning and Procedural Assistance.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2025
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Andrew LinBiomedical Imaging Research Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA; Monash Cardiovascular Research Centre, Victorian Heart Institute, Monash University and MonashHeart, Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Márton KolossváryCardiovascular Imaging Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Sebastien CadetDepartment of Imaging and Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Priscilla McElhinneyBiomedical Imaging Research Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Markus GoellerDepartment of Cardiology, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Faculty of Medicine, Erlangen, Germany.
Donghee HanDepartment of Imaging and Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Jeremy YuvarajMonash Cardiovascular Research Centre, Victorian Heart Institute, Monash University and MonashHeart, Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Nitesh NerlekarMonash Cardiovascular Research Centre, Victorian Heart Institute, Monash University and MonashHeart, Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Piotr J SlomkaArtificial Intelligence in Medicine Program, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Mohamed MarwanDepartment of Cardiology, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Faculty of Medicine, Erlangen, Germany.
Stephen J NichollsMonash Cardiovascular Research Centre, Victorian Heart Institute, Monash University and MonashHeart, Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Stephan AchenbachDepartment of Cardiology, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Faculty of Medicine, Erlangen, Germany.
Pál Maurovich-HorvatMedical Imaging Centre, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary; MTA-SE Cardiovascular Imaging Research Group, Heart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Dennis T L WongMonash Cardiovascular Research Centre, Victorian Heart Institute, Monash University and MonashHeart, Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Damini DeyBiomedical Imaging Research Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA. Electronic address: damini.dey@cshs.org.
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center · USMonash Health · AUFriedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DEHarvard University · USSemmelweis University · HU

Funding

Integrated prediction of cardiovascular events by automated coronary plaque and pericoronary adipose tissue quantification from CT AngiographyR01HL148787 · NHLBI · CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER · PI DEY, DAMINI · 2020 to 2023
$3.0M
Automated quantitative CT imaging of epicardial adipose tissue and risk of cardiac eventsR01HL133616 · NHLBI · CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER · PI DEY, DAMINI · 2016 to 2019
$2.6M
Effect of Intensive Medical Treatment on Quantified Coronary Artery Plaque Components with Serial Coronary CTA in Women with Non-Obstructive CADR01HL151266 · NHLBI · CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER · PI DEY, DAMINI, TAMARAPPOO, BALAJI K. · 2020 to 2023
$1.6M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL133616NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL148787NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL151266
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim of this study was to precisely phenotype culprit and nonculprit lesions in myocardial infarction (MI) and lesions in stable coronary artery disease (CAD) using coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA)-based radiomic analysis.

backgroundIt remains debated whether any single coronary atherosclerotic plaque within the vulnerable patient exhibits unique morphology conferring an increased risk of clinical events.

methodsA total of 60 patients with acute MI prospectively underwent coronary CTA before invasive angiography and were matched to 60 patients with stable CAD. For all coronary lesions, high-risk plaque (HRP) characteristics were qualitatively assessed, followed by semiautomated plaque quantification and extraction of 1,103 radiomic features. Machine learning models were built to examine the additive value of radiomic features for discriminating culprit lesions over and above HRP and plaque volumes.

resultsCulprit lesions had higher mean volumes of noncalcified plaque (NCP) and low-density noncalcified plaque (LDNCP) compared with the highest-grade stenosis nonculprits and highest-grade stenosis stable CAD lesions (NCP: 138.1 mm

conclusionsCulprit lesions and highest-grade stenosis nonculprit lesions in MI have distinct radiomic signatures compared with lesions in stable CAD. Within the vulnerable patient may exist individual vulnerable plaques identifiable by coronary CTA-based precision phenotyping.

Indexed as

Coronary Artery DiseaseCoronary StenosisMyocardial InfarctionPlaque, AtheroscleroticComputed Tomography AngiographyConstriction, PathologicCoronary AngiographyCoronary VesselsHumansPredictive Value of Testscoronary computed tomography angiographycoronary plaquemachine learningmyocardial infarctionradiomics

Identifiers

PMID35512957
PMCPMC9072980
OpenAlexW4225758305

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.