Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35513520›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Admixture and breed traceability in European indigenous pig breeds and wild boar using genome-wide SNP data.

Christos Dadousis, Maria Muñoz, Cristina Óvilo, Maria Chiara Fabbri, José Pedro Araújo, Samuele Bovo, Marjeta Čandek Potokar, Rui Charneca, Alessandro Crovetti, Maurizio Gallo and 19 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. The Revolution of Animal Genomics in Forensic Sciences.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

29 authors.

Christos DadousisDipartimento Di Scienze e Tecnologie Agrarie, Alimentari, Ambientali e Forestali, Università Di Firenze, 50144, Firenze, Italy. christos.dadousis@unipr.it.
Maria MuñozDepartamento Mejora Genética Animal, Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA-CSIC), Crta. de la Coruña, km. 7, 5, 28040, Madrid, Spain.
Cristina ÓviloDepartamento Mejora Genética Animal, Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA-CSIC), Crta. de la Coruña, km. 7, 5, 28040, Madrid, Spain.
Maria Chiara FabbriDipartimento Di Scienze e Tecnologie Agrarie, Alimentari, Ambientali e Forestali, Università Di Firenze, 50144, Firenze, Italy.
José Pedro AraújoCentro de Investigação de Montanha (CIMO), Instituto Politécnico de Viana Do Castelo, Escola Superior Agrária, Refóios do Lima, 4990‑706, Ponte de Lima, Portugal.
Samuele BovoDepartment of Agricultural and Food Sciences, Division of Animal Sciences, University of Bologna, Viale Fanin 46, 40127, Bologna, Italy.
Marjeta Čandek PotokarKmetijski inštitut Slovenije, Hacquetova 17, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Rui CharnecaMED-Mediterranean Institute for Agriculture, Environment and Development & Escola de Ciências E Tecnologia, Universidade de Évora, Pólo da Mitra, Ap. 94, 7006-554, Évora, Portugal.
Alessandro CrovettiDipartimento Di Scienze e Tecnologie Agrarie, Alimentari, Ambientali e Forestali, Università Di Firenze, 50144, Firenze, Italy.
Maurizio GalloAssociazione Nazionale Allevatori Suini (ANAS), Via Nizza 53, 00198, Rome, Italy.
Juan María García-CascoDepartamento Mejora Genética Animal, Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA-CSIC), Crta. de la Coruña, km. 7, 5, 28040, Madrid, Spain.
Danijel KarolyiDepartment of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Zagreb, Svetošimunska c. 25, 10000, Zagreb, Croatia.
Goran KušecFaculty of Agrobiotechnical Sciences Osijek, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Vladimira Preloga 1, 31000, Osijek, Croatia.
José Manuel MartinsMED-Mediterranean Institute for Agriculture, Environment and Development & Escola de Ciências E Tecnologia, Universidade de Évora, Pólo da Mitra, Ap. 94, 7006-554, Évora, Portugal.
Marie-José MercatIFIP Institut du Porc, La Motte au Vicomte, BP 35104, 35651, Le Rheu Cedex, France.
Carolina PuglieseDipartimento Di Scienze e Tecnologie Agrarie, Alimentari, Ambientali e Forestali, Università Di Firenze, 50144, Firenze, Italy.
Raquel QuintanillaPrograma de Genética y Mejora Animal, Institute for Research and Technology in Food and Agriculture (IRTA), Torre Marimon, 08140, Caldes de Montbui, Barcelona, Spain.
Čedomir RadovićDepartment of Pig Breeding and Genetics, Institute for Animal Husbandry, 11080, Belgrade‑Zemun, Serbia.
Violeta RazmaiteAnimal Science Institute, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Baisogala, Lithuania.
Anisa RibaniDepartment of Agricultural and Food Sciences, Division of Animal Sciences, University of Bologna, Viale Fanin 46, 40127, Bologna, Italy.
Juliet RiquetGénétique Physiologie Et Systèmes d'Elevage (GenPhySE), Université de Toulouse, INRA, Chemin de Borde‑Rouge 24, Auzeville Tolosane, 31326, Castanet Tolosan, France.
Radomir SavićFaculty of Agriculture, University of Belgrade, Nemanjina 6, 11080, Belgrade-Zemun, Serbia.
Giuseppina SchiavoDepartment of Agricultural and Food Sciences, Division of Animal Sciences, University of Bologna, Viale Fanin 46, 40127, Bologna, Italy.
Martin ŠkrlepKmetijski inštitut Slovenije, Hacquetova 17, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Silvia TinarelliAssociazione Nazionale Allevatori Suini (ANAS), Via Nizza 53, 00198, Rome, Italy.
Graziano UsaiAGRIS SARDEGNA, Loc. Bonassai, 07100, Sassari, Italy.
Christoph ZimmerBäuerliche Erzeugergemeinschaft Schwäbisch Hall, Schwäbisch Hall, Germany.
Luca FontanesiDepartment of Agricultural and Food Sciences, Division of Animal Sciences, University of Bologna, Viale Fanin 46, 40127, Bologna, Italy.
Riccardo BozziDipartimento Di Scienze e Tecnologie Agrarie, Alimentari, Ambientali e Forestali, Università Di Firenze, 50144, Firenze, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Preserving diversity of indigenous pig (Sus scrofa) breeds is a key factor to (i) sustain the pork chain (both at local and global scales) including the production of high-quality branded products, (ii) enrich the animal biobanking and (iii) progress conservation policies. Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) chips offer the opportunity for whole-genome comparisons among individuals and breeds. Animals from twenty European local pigs breeds, reared in nine countries (Croatia: Black Slavonian, Turopolje; France: Basque, Gascon; Germany: Schwabisch-Hällisches Schwein; Italy: Apulo Calabrese, Casertana, Cinta Senese, Mora Romagnola, Nero Siciliano, Sarda; Lithuania: Indigenous Wattle, White Old Type; Portugal: Alentejana, Bísara; Serbia: Moravka, Swallow-Bellied Mangalitsa; Slovenia: Krškopolje pig; Spain: Iberian, Majorcan Black), and three commercial breeds (Duroc, Landrace and Large White) were sampled and genotyped with the GeneSeek Genomic Profiler (GGP) 70 K HD porcine genotyping chip. A dataset of 51 Wild Boars from nine countries was also added, summing up to 1186 pigs (~ 49 pigs/breed). The aim was to: (i) investigate individual admixture ancestries and (ii) assess breed traceability via discriminant analysis on principal components (DAPC). Albeit the mosaic of shared ancestries found for Nero Siciliano, Sarda and Moravka, admixture analysis indicated independent evolvement for the rest of the breeds. High prediction accuracy of DAPC mark SNP data as a reliable solution for the traceability of breed-specific pig products.

Indexed as

Biological Specimen BanksPolymorphism, Single NucleotideAnimalsGenomePlant BreedingSus scrofaSwine

Identifiers

PMID35513520
PMCPMC9072372

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.