Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35521221›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2022

Standards for Collection, Preservation, and Transportation of Fecal Samples in TCM Clinical Trials.

Wenquan Su, Yawei Du, Fengmei Lian, Hui Wu, Xinrong Zhang, Wenli Yang, Yunfeng Duan, Yuanming Pan, Weijng Liu, Aiming Wu and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Wenquan SuDongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Yawei DuDongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Fengmei LianDepartment of Endocrinology, Guang'anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Hui WuThe First Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Xinrong ZhangFangshan Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Wenli YangDongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Yunfeng DuanInstitute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Yuanming PanThe 7th Medical Center, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Weijng LiuDongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Aiming WuDongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Bowen ZhaoBeijing QuantiHealth Technology Co, Ltd, Beijing, China.
Chongming WuSchool of Chinese Materia Medica, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China.
Shengxian WuDongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Dongzhimen Hospital Affiliated to Beijing University of Chinese Medicine · CNBeijing University of Chinese Medicine · CNChinese People's Liberation Army · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine · CNGuang’anmen Hospital · CNInstitute of Microbiology · CNTianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Unlike chemical drugs with a single or a few kinds of active compounds, traditional Chinese medicines (TCMs)uses herbal formulas composed of numerous kinds of chemical constituents. Therefore, TCM clinical trials require unique and stricter standards for collecting, preserving, and transporting fecal samples than those used for chemical drugs. Unfortunately, there are no special standards for processing fecal samples in TCM clinical trials. Methods: We invited interdisciplinary experts within TCM clinical trials and gut microbiome research to help formulate this standard. After more than a year's in-depth discussion and amendments, we achieved a standard Results: We established a sample information processing method prior to TCM clinical sample collection, which is adapted to the unique features of TCM. The method formulates detailed processing requirements for TCM information in addition to the factors that may disturb the gut microbiome. We also constructed a set of methods for collecting, preserving, and transporting fecal samples that meet the characteristics of TCM. These methods formulate detailed operating specifications on the collection approaches, storage conditions, transportation requirements, and management of fecal samples. Conclusions: This standard guides the information processing prior to sample collection and the standard operating procedures for the collection, preservation, and transportation of fecal samples in TCM clinical trials, which also can be used as a reference by clinicians and researchers in modern medicines.

Indexed as

Drugs, Chinese HerbalGastrointestinal MicrobiomeChinaFecesMedicine, Chinese TraditionalPreservation, BiologicalDrugs, Chinese Herbalclinical trialfecal sample collectionfecal sample processinggut microbiomestandardtraditional Chinese medicine (TCM)

Identifiers

PMID35521221
PMCPMC9065286
OpenAlexW4224280026

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.