Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35522777›Full record

ReviewThe British journal of radiology2022

Idiopathic intracranial hypertension imaging approaches and the implications in patient management.

Amir Hossein Sarrami, David I Bass, Aaron M Rutman, Matthew D Alexander, Mehmet Aksakal, Chengcheng Zhu, Michael R Levitt, Mahmud Mossa-Basha

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The British journal of radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Spontaneous cerebrospinal fluid leaks and encephaloceles: multi-institutional collaborative retrospective analysis of 468 cases with special focus on recurrent cases.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Amir Hossein SarramiDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, United States.
David I BassDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, United States.
Aaron M RutmanDepartment of Radiology, Kaiser Permanente, Seattle, United States.
Matthew D AlexanderDepartment of Radiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States.
Mehmet AksakalDepartment of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, United States.
Chengcheng ZhuDepartment of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, United States.
Michael R LevittDepartment of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, United States.
Mahmud Mossa-BashaDepartment of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, United States.
University of Washington · USSeattle University · USStanford University · USUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) represents a clinical disease entity without a clear etiology, that if left untreated, can result in severe outcomes, including permanent vision loss. For this reason, early diagnosis and treatment is necessary. Historically, the role of cross-sectional imaging has been to rule out secondary or emergent causes of increased intracranial pressure, including tumor, infection, hydrocephalus, or venous thrombosis. MRI and MRV, however, can serve as valuable imaging tools to not only rule out causes for secondary intracranial hypertension but can also detect indirect signs of IIH resultant from increased intracranial pressure, and demonstrate potentially treatable sinus venous stenosis. Digital subtraction venographic imaging also plays a central role in both diagnosis and treatment, providing enhanced anatomic delineation and temporal flow evaluation, quantitative assessment of the pressure gradient across a venous stenosis, treatment guidance, and immediate opportunity for endovascular therapy. In this review, we discuss the multiple modalities for imaging IIH, their limitations, and their contributions to the management of IIH.

Indexed as

Pseudotumor CerebriVascular DiseasesConstriction, PathologicCranial SinusesHumansPhlebographyStents

Identifiers

PMID35522777
PMCPMC10162046
OpenAlexW4229032594

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.