Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35524154›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Functional characterization of α-Gal producing lactic acid bacteria with potential probiotic properties.

Timothy Bamgbose, Pilar Alberdi, Isa O Abdullahi, Helen I Inabo, Mohammed Bello, Swati Sinha, Anupkumar R Anvikar, Lourdes Mateos-Hernandez, Edgar Torres-Maravilla, Luis G Bermúdez-Humarán and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Microorganisms · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Exploring the relationship betweenComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  8. Antiplasmodial Activity of ProbioticJournal of tropical medicine · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Timothy BamgboseICMR-National Institute of Malaria Research, Sector 8, Dwarka, New Delhi, India.
Pilar AlberdiInstituto de Investigación en Recursos Cinegéticos IREC-CSIC-UCLM-JCCM, SaBio, Ronda de Toledo s/n, 13005, Ciudad Real, Spain.
Isa O AbdullahiDepartment of Microbiology, Ahmadu Bello University, Samaru Zaria, Kaduna, Nigeria.
Helen I InaboDepartment of Microbiology, Ahmadu Bello University, Samaru Zaria, Kaduna, Nigeria.
Mohammed BelloDepartment of Veterinary Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Ahmadu Bello University, Samaru Zaria, Kaduna, Nigeria.
Swati SinhaICMR-National Institute of Malaria Research, Sector 8, Dwarka, New Delhi, India.
Anupkumar R AnvikarICMR-National Institute of Malaria Research, Sector 8, Dwarka, New Delhi, India.
Lourdes Mateos-HernandezUMR BIPAR, INRAE, ANSES, Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alfort, Université Paris-Est, 94700, Maisons-Alfort, France.
Edgar Torres-MaravillaINRAE, AgroParisTech, Micalis Institute, Université Paris-Saclay, 78350, Jouy-en-Josas, France.
Luis G Bermúdez-HumaránINRAE, AgroParisTech, Micalis Institute, Université Paris-Saclay, 78350, Jouy-en-Josas, France.
Alejandro Cabezas-CruzUMR BIPAR, INRAE, ANSES, Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alfort, Université Paris-Est, 94700, Maisons-Alfort, France.
Jose de la FuenteInstituto de Investigación en Recursos Cinegéticos IREC-CSIC-UCLM-JCCM, SaBio, Ronda de Toledo s/n, 13005, Ciudad Real, Spain. josedejesus.fuente@uclm.es.
Ahmadu Bello University · NGNational Institute of Malaria Research · INInstitut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement · FRInstituto de Investigación en Recursos Cinegéticos · ESAgroParisTech · FRMicrobiologie de l’alimentation au service de la santé · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The possibility of exploiting the human immune response to glycan α-Gal for the control of multiple infectious diseases has been the objective of recent investigations. In this field of research, the strain of Escherichia coli O86:B7 has been at the forefront, but this Gram-negative microorganism presents a safety concern and therefore cannot be considered as a probiotic. To address this challenge, this study explored the identification of novel lactic acid bacteria with a safe history of use, producing α-Gal and having probiotic potential. The lactic acid bacteria were isolated from different traditionally fermented foods (kununn-zaki, kindirmo, and pulque) and were screened for the production of α-Gal and some specific probiotic potential indicators. The results showed that Ten (10) out of forty (40) [25%] of the tested lactic acid bacteria (LAB) produced α-Gal and were identified as Limosilactobacillus fermentum, Levilactobacillus brevis, Agrilactobacillus composti, Lacticaseibacillus paracasei, Leuconostoc mesenteroides and Weissella confusa. Four (4) LAB strains with highest levels of α-Gal were further selected for in vivo study using a mouse model (α1,3GT KO mice) to elucidate the immunological response to α-Gal. The level of anti-α-Gal IgG observed were not significant while the level of anti-α-Gal IgM was lower in comparison to the level elicited by E. coli O86:B7. We concluded that the lactic acid bacteria in this study producing α-Gal have potential probiotic capacity and can be further explored in α-Gal-focused research for both the prevention and treatment of various infectious diseases and probiotic development.

Indexed as

Fermented FoodsLacticaseibacillus paracaseiLactobacillalesProbioticsEscherichia coli

Identifiers

PMID35524154
PMCPMC9075922
OpenAlexW4229060187

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.