Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35527818›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in neuroscience2022

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Improving Dysphagia After Stroke: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Yu-Lei Xie, Shan Wang, Jia-Meng Jia, Yu-Han Xie, Xin Chen, Wu Qing, Yin-Xu Wang

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yu-Lei XieDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China.
Shan WangDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China.
Jia-Meng JiaDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China.
Yu-Han XieUniversity of South China, Hengyang, China.
Xin ChenDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China.
Wu QingDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China.
Yin-Xu WangDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China.
North Sichuan Medical University · CNAffiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College · CNChengdu Second People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Rehabilitation of post-stroke dysphagia is an urgent clinical problem, and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has been widely used in the study of post-stroke function. However, there is no reliable evidence-based medicine to support the effect of rTMS on post-stroke dysphagia. This review aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of rTMS on post-stroke dysphagia. Methods: English-language literature published before December 20, 2021, were searched in six electronic databases. Identified articles were screened, data were extracted, and the methodological quality of included trials was assessed. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software. The GRADE method was used to assess the quality of the evidence. Results: A total of 10 studies with 246 patients were included. Meta-analysis showed that rTMS significantly improved overall swallowing function (standardized mean difference [SMD]-0.76, 95% confidence interval (CI)-1.07 to-0.46, Conclusion: rTMS improved overall swallowing function and activity of daily living ability and reduced aspiration in post-stroke patients with good acceptability and mild adverse effects.

Indexed as

deglutition disordersmeta-analysisstrokesystematic reviewtranscranial magnetic stimulation

Identifiers

PMID35527818
PMCPMC9072781
OpenAlexW4224245460

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.