Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35531207›Full record

ReviewSaudi journal of biological sciences2022

Potentials, prospects and applications of genome editing technologies in livestock production.

Sayed Haidar Abbas Raza, Abdallah A Hassanin, Sameer D Pant, Sun Bing, Mahmoud Z Sitohy, Sameh A Abdelnour, Mashael Alhumaidi Alotaibi, Tahani Mohamed Al-Hazani, Ayman H Abd El-Aziz, Gong Cheng and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Saudi journal of biological sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Improvement of German Chamomile (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Sayed Haidar Abbas RazaState Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics Breeding & Reproduction, College of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, PR China.
Abdallah A HassaninGenetics Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Zagazig University, Zagazig 44511, Egypt.
Sameer D PantSchool of Agricultural, Environmental and Veterinary Sciences, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, NSW, 2650 Australia.
Sun BingState Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics Breeding & Reproduction, College of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, PR China.
Mahmoud Z SitohyBiochemistry Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Zagazig University, Zagazig 44511, Egypt.
Sameh A AbdelnourAnimal Production Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Zagazig University, Zagazig 44511, Egypt.
Mashael Alhumaidi AlotaibiBiology Department, College of Science, Jouf University, P.O. Box 2014, Sakaka, Saudi Arabia.
Tahani Mohamed Al-HazaniBiology Department, College of Science and Humanities, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, P.O. Box: 83, Al-Kharj 11940, Saudi Arabia.
Ayman H Abd El-AzizAnimal Husbandry and Animal Wealth Development Department, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Daman Hour University, Damanhour, Egypt.
Gong ChengState Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics Breeding & Reproduction, College of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, PR China.
Linsen ZanState Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics Breeding & Reproduction, College of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, PR China.
Northwest A&F University · CNZagazig University · EGAl Jouf University · SACharles Sturt University · AUDamanhour University · EGNational Beef Cattle Industrial Technology System · CNPrince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, significant progress has been achieved in genome editing applications using new programmable DNA nucleases such as zinc finger nucleases (ZFNs), transcription activator-like endonucleases (TALENs) and the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats/Cas9 system (CRISPR/Cas9). These genome editing tools are capable of nicking DNA precisely by targeting specific sequences, and enable the addition, removal or substitution of nucleotides via double-stranded breakage at specific genomic loci. CRISPR/Cas system, one of the most recent genome editing tools, affords the ability to efficiently generate multiple genomic nicks in single experiment. Moreover, CRISPR/Cas systems are relatively easy and cost effective when compared to other genome editing technologies. This is in part because CRISPR/Cas systems rely on RNA-DNA binding, unlike other genome editing tools that rely on protein-DNA interactions, which affords CRISPR/Cas systems higher flexibility and more fidelity. Genome editing tools have significantly contributed to different aspects of livestock production such as disease resistance, improved performance, alterations of milk composition, animal welfare and biomedicine. However, despite these contributions and future potential, genome editing technologies also have inherent risks, and therefore, ethics and social acceptance are crucial factors associated with implementation of these technologies. This review emphasizes the impact of genome editing technologies in development of livestock breeding and production in numerous species such as cattle, pigs, sheep and goats. This review also discusses the mechanisms behind genome editing technologies, their potential applications, risks and associated ethics that should be considered in the context of livestock.

Indexed as

CRISPR/Cas9Genome editingLivestockMeganucleasesTALENsZFNs

Identifiers

PMID35531207
PMCPMC9072931
OpenAlexW3216803854

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.