ArticleJAMA internal medicine2022
Time to Clinical Benefit of Intensive Blood Pressure Lowering in Patients 60 Years and Older With Hypertension: A Secondary Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.
Article in JAMA internal medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.
- Higher blood pressure targets for hypertension in older adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024Pooled it
- Time to Benefit of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors Among Patients With Heart Failure.JAMA network open · 2023 · on this mapPooled it
- Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial of Intensive Systolic Blood Pressure Control in Patients With Renal Cell or Thyroid Cancer Receiving VEGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors: ECOG-ACRIN EAQ191.Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979) · 2026Trial
- Association of Systolic Blood Pressure Time in Target Range With Cardiovascular Events Among PRECISION Participants.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2025Trial
- Effect of Intensive Blood Pressure Control and Comorbidity Status on the Prognosis of Patients With Hypertension: Insights From SPRINT.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Trial
- Optimizing cardiovascular pharmacotherapy in older adults with frailty.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2026Review
- Time to benefit estimation in multicenter studies using flexible hazard shared frailty models.BMC medical research methodology · 2026Article
- Fruit and Vegetable Consumption and Its Public Health Implications for Hypertension Among Peruvian Aged 15 Years and Older: Evidence from the 2022-2023 Demographic and Health Survey.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Highlights of the 2026 Korean Society of Hypertension guidelines for the management of hypertension: what's new and what has changed.Clinical hypertension · 2026Review
- Meta-analysis of the association between marital status and hypertension: evaluating the impact of age and gender.American journal of cardiovascular disease · 2026Review
- Ikigai in aging hearts: Japan's approach to cardiovascular care.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2025Review
- Mean arterial pressure at the initiation of continuous renal replacement therapy as a prognostic indicator in patients with acute kidney injury.Renal failure · 2025Observational
- Article
- Metformin use on the risks of depression and anxiety in people with type 2 diabetes.Communications medicine · 2025Article
- High Blood Pressure and Impaired Brain Health: Investigating the Neuroprotective Potential of Magnesium.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Drug-gene interactions in older patients with coronary artery disease.BMC geriatrics · 2024Article
- Risk factors of undiagnosed and uncontrolled hypertension in primary care patients with hypertension: a cross-sectional study.BMC primary care · 2024Article
- Article
- The trend of hypertension-related chronic kidney disease from 1990 to 2019 and its predictions over 25 years: an analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019.International urology and nephrology · 2024Article
- Correspondence: Prevention of stroke.The British journal of cardiology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
10 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Recent guidelines recommend a systolic blood pressure (BP) goal of less than 150 mm Hg or even 130 mm Hg for adults aged 60 years or older. However, harms from intensive BP treatments occur immediately (eg, syncope, fall), and benefits for cardiovascular event reduction emerge over time. Therefore, harms with low chance of benefit need to be clearer, particularly for those with limited life expectancy. Objective: To estimate the time needed to potentially derive clinical benefit from intensive BP treatment in patients 60 years and older. Design, Setting, and Participants: This secondary analysis included individual patient data from published randomized clinical trials with 27 414 patients 60 years or older with hypertension. Patient-level survival data were reconstructed when the original data were not available. Published trials were identified by searching PubMed until October 15, 2021. Exposures: Intensive BP lowering vs standard BP lowering with the treat-to-target design. Main Outcomes and Measures: Major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) defined by each trial, which was broadly similar with all trials including myocardial infarction, stroke, and cardiovascular mortality. Results: Six trials (original data from 2 trials and reconstructed data from 4 trials) with 27 414 participants (mean age, 70 years; 56.3% were women) were included in the analysis. Intensive BP treatment with a systolic BP target below 140 mm Hg was significantly associated with a 21% reduction in MACE (hazard ratio, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.71-0.88; P < .001). On average, 9.1 (95% CI, 4.0-20.6) months were needed to prevent 1 MACE per 500 patients with the intensive BP treatment (absolute risk reduction [ARR], 0.002). Likewise, 19.1 (95% CI, 10.9-34.2) and 34.4 (95% CI, 22.7-59.8) months were estimated to avoid 1 MACE per 200 (ARR, 0.005) and 100 (ARR, 0.01) patients, respectively. Conclusions and Relevance: In this analysis, findings suggest that for patients 60 years and older with hypertension, intensive BP treatment may be appropriate for some adults with a life expectancy of greater than 3 years but may not be suitable for those with less than 1 year.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.