Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35532917›Full record

ArticleJAMA internal medicine2022

Time to Clinical Benefit of Intensive Blood Pressure Lowering in Patients 60 Years and Older With Hypertension: A Secondary Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.

Tao Chen, Fang Shao, Kangyu Chen, Yang Wang, Zhenqiang Wu, Yongjuan Wang, Yanpei Gao, Victoria Cornelius, Chao Li, Zhixin Jiang

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA internal medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
9.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Higher blood pressure targets for hypertension in older adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Ikigai in aging hearts: Japan's approach to cardiovascular care.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2025
    Review
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Correspondence: Prevention of stroke.The British journal of cardiology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Tao ChenDepartment of Public Health, Policy and Systems, Institute of Population Health, The University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Fang ShaoDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Jiangsu, Nanjing, China.
Kangyu ChenDepartment of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Hefei, China.
Yang WangMedical Research and Biometrics Center, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Disease, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Mentougou District, Beijing, China.
Zhenqiang WuDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Yongjuan WangDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Xi'an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Xi'an, China.
Yanpei GaoDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Xi'an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Xi'an, China.
Victoria CorneliusImperial Clinical Trials Unit, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Chao LiDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Xi'an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Xi'an, China.
Zhixin JiangDepartment of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Jiangsu Province Hospital, China.
Xi'an Jiaotong University · CNNanjing Medical University · CNImperial College London · GBUniversity of Auckland · NZUniversity of Liverpool · GBUniversity of Science and Technology of China · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Recent guidelines recommend a systolic blood pressure (BP) goal of less than 150 mm Hg or even 130 mm Hg for adults aged 60 years or older. However, harms from intensive BP treatments occur immediately (eg, syncope, fall), and benefits for cardiovascular event reduction emerge over time. Therefore, harms with low chance of benefit need to be clearer, particularly for those with limited life expectancy. Objective: To estimate the time needed to potentially derive clinical benefit from intensive BP treatment in patients 60 years and older. Design, Setting, and Participants: This secondary analysis included individual patient data from published randomized clinical trials with 27 414 patients 60 years or older with hypertension. Patient-level survival data were reconstructed when the original data were not available. Published trials were identified by searching PubMed until October 15, 2021. Exposures: Intensive BP lowering vs standard BP lowering with the treat-to-target design. Main Outcomes and Measures: Major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) defined by each trial, which was broadly similar with all trials including myocardial infarction, stroke, and cardiovascular mortality. Results: Six trials (original data from 2 trials and reconstructed data from 4 trials) with 27 414 participants (mean age, 70 years; 56.3% were women) were included in the analysis. Intensive BP treatment with a systolic BP target below 140 mm Hg was significantly associated with a 21% reduction in MACE (hazard ratio, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.71-0.88; P < .001). On average, 9.1 (95% CI, 4.0-20.6) months were needed to prevent 1 MACE per 500 patients with the intensive BP treatment (absolute risk reduction [ARR], 0.002). Likewise, 19.1 (95% CI, 10.9-34.2) and 34.4 (95% CI, 22.7-59.8) months were estimated to avoid 1 MACE per 200 (ARR, 0.005) and 100 (ARR, 0.01) patients, respectively. Conclusions and Relevance: In this analysis, findings suggest that for patients 60 years and older with hypertension, intensive BP treatment may be appropriate for some adults with a life expectancy of greater than 3 years but may not be suitable for those with less than 1 year.

Indexed as

HypertensionMyocardial InfarctionAgedAntihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAntihypertensive Agents

Identifiers

PMID35532917
PMCPMC9086939
OpenAlexW4229444307

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.