Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35534914›Full record

ArticleJournal of perinatal medicine2022

Impact of earlier gestational diabetes screening for pregnant people with obesity on maternal and perinatal outcomes.

Teresa A Hillier, Kathryn L Pedula, Keith K Ogasawara, Kimberly K Vesco, Caryn Oshiro, Jan L Van Marter

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of perinatal medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Time to Move Beyond a Binary Criterion for Gestational Diabetes?Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Progress in Research on Biomarkers of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus and Preeclampsia.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Teresa A HillierCenter for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, USA.
Kathryn L PedulaCenter for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, USA.
Keith K OgasawaraHawaii Permanente Medical Group, Kaiser Permanente Hawaii, Honolulu, HI, USA.
Kimberly K VescoCenter for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, USA.
Caryn OshiroCenter for Integrated Health Care Research, Kaiser Permanente Hawaii, Honolulu, HI, USA.
Jan L Van MarterCenter for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, USA.
Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research · USKaiser Permanente · USHawaii Permanente Medical Group · US

Funding

Comparing Two Gestational Diabetes Screening Methods: A Pragmatic Outpatient RCTR01HD074794 · NICHD · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI HILLIER, TERESA A · 2014 to 2018
$3.1M
Impact of Early Gestational Diabetes Screening in High-Risk PopulationsR01HD058015 · NICHD · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI HILLIER, TERESA A · 2009 to 2012
$2.1M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD058015NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD074794
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesGestational diabetes (GDM) screening at 24-28 weeks' gestation reduces risk of adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes. While experts recommend first-trimester screening for high-risk patients, including those with obesity, data supporting this recommendation is limited.

methodsWe implemented a systematic population intervention to encourage first-trimester GDM screening by oral glucose tolerance testing in a cohort of pregnant people with obesity in two integrated health systems from 2009 to 2013, and compared outcomes to the same population pre-intervention (2006-2009). Up to five years of postpartum glucose testing results (through 2018) were assessed among GDM cases in the post-intervention group. Primary outcomes were large-for-gestational-age birthweight (LGA); macrosomia; a perinatal composite outcome; gestational hypertension/preeclampsia; cesarean delivery; and medication treatment of GDM.

resultsA total of 40,206 patients (9,156 with obesity) were screened for GDM; 2,672 (6.6%) were diagnosed with GDM. Overall, multivariate adjusted risk for LGA and cesarean delivery were lower following the intervention (LGA: aOR 0.89 [0.82, 0.96]; cesarean delivery: 0.89 [0.85, 0.93]). This difference was more pronounced in patients diagnosed with GDM (LGA: aOR 0.52 [0.39, 0.70]; cesarean delivery 0.78 [0.65, 0.94]); insulin/oral hypoglycemic treatment rates for GDM were also higher post-intervention than pre-intervention (22 vs. 29%; p<0.0001). There were no differences for the other primary outcomes. Only 20% of patients diagnosed with GDM early in pregnancy who had postpartum testing had results in the overt diabetes range, suggesting a spectrum of diabetes detected early in pregnancy.

conclusionsFirst trimester GDM screening for pregnant people with obesity may improve GDM-associated outcomes.

Indexed as

Diabetes, GestationalInsulinsFemaleGlucoseHumansHypoglycemic AgentsObesityPregnancyPregnancy OutcomeGlucoseHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinsearly gestational diabetesearly gestational diabetes screeningearly pregnancygestational diabetes (GDM)interventionobesitytiming of screening

Identifiers

PMID35534914
PMCPMC9519183
OpenAlexW4229454688

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.