Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35535689›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2022

Mutation Load in Sunflower Inversions Is Negatively Correlated with Inversion Heterozygosity.

Kaichi Huang, Kate L Ostevik, Cassandra Elphinstone, Marco Todesco, Natalia Bercovich, Gregory L Owens, Loren H Rieseberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Repeated global adaptation across plant species.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kaichi HuangDepartment of Botany and Biodiversity Research Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0378-5988
Kate L OstevikDepartment of Botany and Biodiversity Research Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2197-9284
Cassandra ElphinstoneDepartment of Botany and Biodiversity Research Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Marco TodescoDepartment of Botany and Biodiversity Research Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6227-4096
Natalia BercovichDepartment of Botany and Biodiversity Research Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7703-2858
Gregory L OwensDepartment of Botany and Biodiversity Research Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4019-5215
Loren H RiesebergDepartment of Botany and Biodiversity Research Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2712-2417

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recombination is critical both for accelerating adaptation and purging deleterious mutations. Chromosomal inversions can act as recombination modifiers that suppress local recombination in heterozygotes and thus, under some conditions, are predicted to accumulate such mutations. In this study, we investigated patterns of recombination, transposable element abundance, and coding sequence evolution across the genomes of 1,445 individuals from three sunflower species, as well as within nine inversions segregating within species. We also analyzed the effects of inversion genotypes on 87 phenotypic traits to test for overdominance. We found significant negative correlations of long terminal repeat retrotransposon abundance and deleterious mutations with recombination rates across the genome in all three species. However, we failed to detect an increase in these features in the inversions, except for a modest increase in the proportion of stop codon mutations in several very large or rare inversions. Consistent with this finding, there was little evidence of overdominance of inversions in phenotypes that may relate to fitness. On the other hand, significantly greater load was observed for inversions in populations polymorphic for a given inversion compared to populations monomorphic for one of the arrangements, suggesting that the local state of inversion polymorphism affects deleterious load. These seemingly contradictory results can be explained by the low frequency of inversion heterozygotes in wild sunflower populations, apparently due to divergent selection and associated geographic structure. Inversions contributing to local adaptation represent ideal recombination modifiers, acting to facilitate adaptive divergence with gene flow, while largely escaping the accumulation of deleterious mutations.

Indexed as

Chromosome InversionHelianthusGene FlowHeterozygoteMutationcentromeresdeleterious mutationHelianthusinversionrecombination ratetransposable element

Identifiers

PMID35535689
PMCPMC9127631

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.