Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35541283›Full record

ReviewNature reviews psychology2022

Integrating time into stigma and health research.

Valerie A Earnshaw, Ryan J Watson, Lisa A Eaton, Natalie M Brousseau, Jean-Philippe Laurenceau, Annie B Fox

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews psychology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Valerie A EarnshawDepartment of Human Development and Family Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4147-3301
Ryan J WatsonDepartment of Human Development and Family Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT USA.
Lisa A EatonDepartment of Human Development and Family Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT USA.
Natalie M BrousseauInstitute for Collaboration on Health, Intervention, and Policy, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT USA.
Jean-Philippe LaurenceauDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8069-867X
Annie B FoxSchool of Healthcare Leadership, MGH Institute of Health Professions, Boston, MA USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4776-1873

Funding

Training in Social Processes of HIV/AIDST32MH074387 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT STORRS · PI KALICHMAN, SETH C · 2006 to 2020
$3.9M
PrEP and substance use among sexual minority young adultsK01DA047918 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT STORRS · PI WATSON, RYAN J · 2019 to 2023
$952k
Understanding and Addressing Disclosure to Members of Social Networks among People Recovering from Substance Use DisordersK01DA042881 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE · PI EARNSHAW, VALERIE ANN · 2017 to 2020
$756k
NIDA NIH HHS K01 DA042881NIDA NIH HHS K01 DA047918NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH074387
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stigma changes over time: it waxes and wanes through history, is manifested within humans who develop over time and is tied to statuses (such as attributes, illnesses and identities) that have varying courses. Despite the inherent fluidity of stigma, theories, research and interventions typically treat associations between stigma and health as stagnant. Consequently, the literature provides little insight into when experiences of stigma are most harmful to health and when stigma interventions should be implemented. In this Perspective, we argue that integrating time into stigma research can accelerate progress towards understanding and intervening in associations between stigma and health inequities. We situate time in relation to key concepts in stigma research, identify three timescales that are relevant for understanding stigma (historical context, human development and status course), and outline a time-based research agenda to improve scientists' ability to understand and address stigma to improve health.

Indexed as

DiseasesInterdisciplinary studiesPsychology

Identifiers

PMID35541283
PMCPMC8900470

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.