ReviewRSC advances2019
An insight into biomimetic 4D printing.
Review in RSC advances, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- 4D printing: innovative solutions and technological advances in orthopedic repair and reconstruction, personalized treatment and drug delivery.Biomedical engineering online · 2025Review
- Three/Four-Dimensional Printed PLA Nano/Microstructures: Crystallization Principles and Practical Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Polysaccharide-based biomaterials in a journey from 3D to 4D printing.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2023Review
- Bio-Inspired 4D Printing of Dynamic Spider Silks.Polymers · 2022Article
- 4D Printing Applications in the Development of Smart Cardiovascular Implants.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Review
- Recent advances in 3D printing of nanocellulose: structure, preparation, and application prospects.Nanoscale advances · 2021Review
- Recent Advances in Microswimmers for Biomedical Applications.Micromachines · 2020Review
- Significance of 4D printing for dentistry: Materials, process, and potentials.Journal of oral biology and craniofacial researchReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
4D printed objects are indexed under additive manufacturing (AM) objects. The 4D printed materials are stimulus-responsive and have shape-changing features. However, the manufacturing of such objects is still a challenging task. For this, the designing space has to be explored in the initial stages, which is lagging so far. This paper encompasses two recent approaches to explore the conceptual design of 4D printed objects in detail: (a) an application-based modeling and simulation approach for phytomimetic structures and (b) a voxel-based modeling and simulation approach. The voxel-based modeling and simulation approach has the enhanced features for the rapid testing (prior to moving into design procedures) of the given distribution of such 4D printed smart materials (SMs) while checking for behaviors, particularly when these intelligent materials are exposed to a stimulus. The voxel-based modeling and simulation approach is further modified using bi-exponential expressions to encode the time-dependent behavior of the bio-inspired 4D printed materials. The shape-changing materials are inspired from biological objects, such as flowers, which are temperature-sensitive or touch-sensitive, and can be 4D printed in such a way that they are encrypted with a decentralized, anisotropic enlargement feature under a restrained alignment of cellulose fibers as in the case of composite hydrogels. Such plant-inspired architectures can change shapes when immersed in water. This paper also outlines a review of the 4D printing of (a) smart photocurable and biocompatible scaffolds with renewable plant oils, which can be a better alternative to traditional polyethylene glycol diacrylate (PEGDA) to support human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs), and (b) a biomimetic dual shape-changing tube having applications in biomedical engineering as a bioimplant. The future applications would be based on these smart and intelligent materials; thus, it is important to modify the existing voxel-based modeling and simulation approach and discuss efficient printing methods to fabricate such bio-inspired materials.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.