Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35545125›Full record

ArticleApplied clinical informatics2022

25 × 5 Symposium to Reduce Documentation Burden: Report-out and Call for Action.

Mollie Hobensack, Deborah R Levy, Kenrick Cato, Don E Detmer, Kevin B Johnson, Jeffrey Williamson, Judy Murphy, Amanda Moy, Jennifer Withall, Rachel Lee and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied clinical informatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Generative AI Demonstrated Difficulty Reasoning on Nursing Flowsheet Data.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Mollie HobensackColumbia University School of Nursing, New York, New York, United States.
Deborah R LevyOregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States.
Kenrick CatoColumbia University School of Nursing, New York, New York, United States.
Don E DetmerDepartment of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States.
Kevin B JohnsonUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.
Jeffrey WilliamsonAmerican Medical Informatics Association, Bethesda, Maryland, United States.
Judy MurphyMinneapolis, Minnesota, United States.
Amanda MoyDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States.
Jennifer WithallColumbia University School of Nursing, New York, New York, United States.
Rachel LeeColumbia University School of Nursing, New York, New York, United States.
Sarah Collins RossettiColumbia University School of Nursing, New York, New York, United States.
Samuel Trent RosenbloomDepartments of Biomedical Informatics Internal Medicine and Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.

Funding

Training in Biomedical Informatics at Columbia UniversityT15LM007079 · NLM · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI NOEMIE ELHADAD, GEORGE M HRIPCSAK · 1992 to 2026
$28.9M
Reducing Health Disparities Through Informatics - Genomics SupplementT32NR007969 · NINR · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI SUZANNE BAKKEN, Rebecca Schnall · 2002 to 2026
$7.9M
25 by 5: Symposium to Reduce Documentation Burden on US Clinicians by 75% by 2025R13LM013581 · NLM · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI ROSENBLOOM, S TRENT, ROSSETTI, SARAH COLLINS · 2020 to 2020
$18k
NINR NIH HHS T32 NR007969NLM NIH HHS R13 LM013581NLM NIH HHS T15 LM007079
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe widespread adoption of electronic health records and a simultaneous increase in regulatory demands have led to an acceleration of documentation requirements among clinicians. The corresponding burden from documentation requirements is a central contributor to clinician burnout and can lead to an increased risk of suboptimal patient care.

objectiveTo address the problem of documentation burden,

methodsThe Symposium consisted of six weekly sessions with 33 presentations. The first four sessions included panel presentations discussing the challenges related to documentation burden. The final two sessions consisted of breakout groups aimed at engaging attendees in establishing interventions for reducing clinical documentation burden. Steering Committee members analyzed notes from each breakout group to develop a list of action items.

resultsThe Steering Committee synthesized and prioritized 82 action items into

conclusionThe Symposium successfully generated a list of interventions for short-, medium-, and long-term timeframes as a launching point to address documentation burden in explicit action-oriented ways. Addressing interventions to reduce undue documentation burden placed on clinicians will necessitate collaboration among all stakeholders.

Indexed as

Burnout, ProfessionalDocumentationBurnout, PsychologicalElectronic Health RecordsHumansResearch ReportUnited States

Identifiers

PMID35545125
PMCPMC9095342

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.