Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35546306›Full record

SynthesisAmerican journal of medical genetics. Part A2022

A systematic review and meta-analysis of intellectual, neuropsychological, and psychoeducational functioning in neurofibromatosis type 1.

Andrew J D Crow, Jennica M Janssen, Carolina Marshall, Anne Moffit, Laura Brennan, Christian G Kohler, David R Roalf, Paul J Moberg

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in American journal of medical genetics. Part A, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Andrew J D CrowDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5037-6212
Jennica M JanssenDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Carolina MarshallDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Anne MoffitDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Laura BrennanGenomind, San Diego, California, USA.
Christian G KohlerDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
David R RoalfDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Paul J MobergDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USDrexel University · USGenomatica (United States) · USHope College · USPennsylvania State University · US

Funding

Ultra-high field GluCEST MRI and MRS in youth at risk for psychosisR01MH120174 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI ROALF, DAVID R · 2020 to 2024
$3.8M
Olfactory and facial markers of developmental risk for psychosis in 22q11 deletion syndromeR01MH119185 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI ROALF, DAVID R · 2019 to 2024
$3.5M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH119185NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH120174
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neurofibromatosis Type 1 (NF1) is a common genetic disorder frequently associated with cognitive deficits. Despite cognitive deficits being a key feature of NF1, the profile of such impairments in NF1 has been shown to be heterogeneous. Thus, we sought to quantitatively synthesize the extant literature on cognitive functioning in NF1. A random-effects meta-analysis of cross-sectional studies was carried out comparing cognitive functioning of patients with NF1 to typically developing or unaffected sibling comparison subjects of all ages. Analyses included 50 articles (Total N

Indexed as

Cognition DisordersNeurofibromatosis 1AdolescentAdultAgedChildChild, PreschoolCognitionCross-Sectional StudiesHumansInfantMiddle AgedNeuropsychological TestsYoung Adultacademicclinical assessmentcognitiveintelligenceNF1research synthesis

Identifiers

PMID35546306
PMCPMC9302478
OpenAlexW4280576409

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.