Optimization of Preservation Methods Provides Insights into Photosynthetic Picoeukaryotes in Lakes.

As the key contributor to plankton biomass and nutrient cycling in aquatic ecosystems, photosynthetic picoeukaryotes (PPEs) have been recently investigated in freshwater ecosystems. However, the limited access to remote areas creates challenges for PPE sample preservation before sorting and counting by flow cytometry (FCM) in the laboratory. Here, we explored the effects of different preservation methods on the PPE community by combining FCM sorting and high-throughput sequencing. Our results showed that dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) cryoprotection could destroy the fluorescence and cell structure of the PPEs, making the subsequent FCM analysis and sorting difficult. Aldehyde fixation maintained the PPE fluorescence, and the fixed samples were of sufficient quality for abundance analysis and sorting by FCM. However, the sequencing results showed that, after preservation by aldehydes, the proportion of PPEs dramatically decreased to approximately 10%, in comparison to 90% in the fresh samples, and the sequences of Ascomycota significantly increased. In contrast, preservation with Pluronic F68 (F68) not only could maintain the PPE abundance close to the initial value but also could keep the PPE community similar to that in the fresh samples over a storage time of 6 months. Thus, F68 cryopreservation is a suitable preservation method for PPE communities from freshwater lakes.