ArticleProceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering2021
Characterizing Mechanical Properties of Soft Tissues Using Non-contact Displacement Measurements: How Should We Assess the Uncertainty?
Article in Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Techniques aimed at the non-invasive characterization of soft tissues according to elastic properties are rapidly evolving. Virtual touch-based elastographic methods including acoustic radiation force imaging (ARFI) and optical elastography measure the peak axial displacement (PD) and time-to-peak-displacement (TTP) of tissue in response to a localized force. These measurements have been used clinically to differentiate tissues, albeit with mixed results. However, to date, the reason has not been fully understood. In this study, we apply a novel modeling approach to explore the mechanistic link between simplistic displacement measurements and tissue viscoelasticity in the application of virtual touch-based elastographic methods to staging chronic liver disease (CLD). To our knowledge, such a study has not been reported in the literature. Specifically, a numerical screening study was first conducted to identify factors that most strongly determine PD and TTP. Response surface experimental designs were then applied to these factors to produce meta-models of expected PD and TTP probability density functions (PDFs) as functions of identified factors. Results from the screening study suggest that both PD and TTP measurements are primarily influenced by three factors: the initial Young's modulus of the tissue, the first viscoelastic Prony series time constant, and pre-compression applied during acquisition. To investigate the implications of these results, stochastic inputs for these three factors associated were used to determine a robust response surface. The identified response surface methodology can be used to determine optimal cutoff values for PD and TTP that could be used in order to stage chronic liver disease.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.