Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35548276›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2022

Evolutionary Ecology of Plant-Arthropod Interactions in Light of the "Omics" Sciences: A Broad Guide.

Ivan M De-la-Cruz, Femke Batsleer, Dries Bonte, Carolina Diller, Timo Hytönen, Anne Muola, Sonia Osorio, David Posé, Martijn L Vandegehuchte, Johan A Stenberg

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ivan M De-la-CruzDepartment of Plant Protection Biology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Alnarp, Sweden.
Femke BatsleerTerrestrial Ecology Unit, Department of Biology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Dries BonteTerrestrial Ecology Unit, Department of Biology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Carolina DillerDepartment of Plant Protection Biology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Alnarp, Sweden.
Timo HytönenDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, Viikki Plant Science Centre, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Anne MuolaDepartment of Plant Protection Biology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Alnarp, Sweden.
Sonia OsorioDepartamento de Biología Molecular y Bioquímica, Instituto de Hortofruticultura Subtropical y Mediterránea "La Mayora", Universidad de Málaga-Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Campus de Teatinos, Málaga, Spain.
David PoséDepartamento de Biología Molecular y Bioquímica, Instituto de Hortofruticultura Subtropical y Mediterránea "La Mayora", Universidad de Málaga-Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Campus de Teatinos, Málaga, Spain.
Martijn L VandegehuchteTerrestrial Ecology Unit, Department of Biology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Johan A StenbergDepartment of Plant Protection Biology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Alnarp, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aboveground plant-arthropod interactions are typically complex, involving herbivores, predators, pollinators, and various other guilds that can strongly affect plant fitness, directly or indirectly, and individually, synergistically, or antagonistically. However, little is known about how ongoing natural selection by these interacting guilds shapes the evolution of plants, i.e., how they affect the differential survival and reproduction of genotypes due to differences in phenotypes in an environment. Recent technological advances, including next-generation sequencing, metabolomics, and gene-editing technologies along with traditional experimental approaches (e.g., quantitative genetics experiments), have enabled far more comprehensive exploration of the genes and traits involved in complex ecological interactions. Connecting different levels of biological organization (genes to communities) will enhance the understanding of evolutionary interactions in complex communities, but this requires a multidisciplinary approach. Here, we review traditional and modern methods and concepts, then highlight future avenues for studying the evolution of plant-arthropod interactions (e.g., plant-herbivore-pollinator interactions). Besides promoting a fundamental understanding of plant-associated arthropod communities' genetic background and evolution, such knowledge can also help address many current global environmental challenges.

Indexed as

genomicsmetabolomicsnatural selectionplant defensesplant-insect interactions

Identifiers

PMID35548276
PMCPMC9084618

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.