Evidence mapPaperPMID 35548377Full record

ArticlePaediatric & neonatal pain2019

Use of vein-viewing device to assist intravenous cannulation decreases the time and number of attempts for successful cannulation in pediatric patients.

Alka Sara Saju, Lilly Prasad, Menaka Reghuraman, Immanuel Karl Sampath

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Paediatric & neonatal pain, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. "Not even my husband knows that I have this [breast cancer]": survivors' experiences in accessing, navigating and coping with treatment.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alka Sara SajuDepartment of Paediatric Nursing Christian Medical College Vellore Tamil Nadu India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3288-9460
Lilly PrasadDepartment of Paediatric Nursing Christian Medical College Vellore Tamil Nadu India.
Menaka ReghuramanDepartment of Paediatric Nursing Christian Medical College Vellore Tamil Nadu India.
Immanuel Karl SampathDepartment of Paediatric Surgery Christian Medical College Vellore Tamil Nadu India.
Christian Medical College, Vellore · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Every child who contacts a healthcare setting has a potential for intravenous cannulation (IV) procedure and related pain, fear, and distress. Many of the healthcare professionals recognize that there is a lack of intervention to prevent multiple cannulation attempts and to reduce pain and distress inflicted to children during IV cannulation. A quasi-experimental study was undertaken in pediatric patients to study the effect of a vein-viewing device (VTorch) on IV cannulation procedure. The number of cannulation attempts and time taken for successful cannulation were assessed with the use of this device (experimental group, n = 159) and compared it with the standard procedure (control group, n = 159). The effect of this device in cannulation associated pain, fear, and behavioral distress were also evaluated among these children. Using Vein-viewing device as an aid for IV cannulation significantly reduced the time taken for cannulation (

Indexed as

behavioral distressfearpainpediatricperipheral cannulationvein‐viewing device

Identifiers

PMID35548377
PMCPMC8975231
OpenAlexW2987453909

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.