ArticleTransplantation and cellular therapy2022
Longitudinal Patient Reported Outcomes with CAR-T Cell Therapy Versus Autologous and Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant.
Article in Transplantation and cellular therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
38 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cancer-related cognitive impairment in patients with hematologic malignancies after CAR T cell therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025Pooled it
- Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy for Myeloma: Where Are We Now and What Is Needed to Move Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells Forward to Earlier Lines of Therapy? Expert Panel Opinion from the American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy.Transplantation and cellular therapy · 2024Guideline
- Cognitive dysfunction associated with cellular immunotherapy for cancer.Neuro-oncology advances · 2026Review
- Quality of Life in CAR-T Cell Therapy.Hematology reports · 2026Review
- Psychological Prehabilitation for People Undergoing Autologous Stem Cell Transplant: A Qualitative Study.Psycho-oncology · 2026Article
- Symptom distress evolution over the first year after allogeneic stem cell transplantation - a prospective observational sub-study of the SMILe project.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Observational
- Tisagenlecleucel yields superior patient-reported health-related quality of life compared to autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphomas.Annals of hematology · 2026Article
- MSCs and MSC-Exos in pediatric ARDS treatment: translational research and the reshaping of nursing roles.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Review
- The Neurocognitive Impact of CAR T Cell Therapy in Hematological Cancers: A Systematic Review of Cognitive Function, Quality of Life, and Psychological Outcomes.Health science reports · 2025Review
- Assessing Quality of Life and Symptoms in Transplantation and CAR-T Recipients: Expert Panel Recommendations from the Survivorship Special Interest Group of ASTCT.Transplantation and cellular therapy · 2025Review
- Patients' and caregivers' perspectives on preparedness for and experience with chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy.The oncologist · 2025Article
- Assessing cognitive function in transplantation and chimeric antigen receptor t cell therapy recipients: Expert recommendations from the survivorship, aging and biobehavioral special interest groups of the American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy.Transplantation and cellular therapy · 2025Review
- Development of A Novel Scoring Index to Quantify the Need for Nutritional Support Interventions During Stem Cell Transplant and Gene Therapy in Children.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2025Article
- Chimeric Antigen Receptor Cell Therapy: Current Status and Its Potential in Aging and Alzheimer's Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Advancing CAR T-Cell Therapy in Solid Tumors: Current Landscape and Future Directions.Cancers · 2025Review
- CAR-T cell therapy in older adults with relapsed/refractory LBCL: benefits and challenges.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2025Review
- Novel Neurocognitive Testing Tool for Early Neurotoxicity Detection Following Anti-CD19 and Anti-BCMA Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T-cell Therapy: A Pilot Study.Clinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia · 2025Article
- Long-Term Cognitive Outcomes in Adult Patients Receiving Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapies.Transplantation and cellular therapy · 2025Article
- Review
- Chimeric Antigen Receptor-T Cells in the Modern Era of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Treatment.Cancers · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
17 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
There are limited data on patient experience after chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, especially in comparison to autologous and allogeneic transplantation, which are more established forms of cellular therapy. We prospectively evaluated longitudinal patient-reported quality of life (QoL), symptom burden and cognition after CAR-T cell therapy and compared it with prospective cohorts of patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation (autoSCT) and allogeneic SCT (alloSCT). This was a single center study. The primary endpoint was change in QoL. Secondary endpoints were patient-reported adverse events (PRO-AEs) measured by Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) and cognitive function (NeuroQOLv2 questionnaire). Time profile of PRO-AEs was evaluated using longitudinal analysis, Toxicity over Time (ToxT). Patients completed questionnaires at baseline, week 2 and monthly for 6 months. One hundred four patients were evaluable (CAR-T: 34, autoSCT: 33, alloSCT: 37). Baseline QoL was similar across groups. We observed a short-term decline in QoL in all groups that gradually returned to baseline. The nadir in QoL was at week 2 and coincided with peak in symptom burden. The decline in overall QoL, physical and functional well-being was significantly less with CAR-T versus SCT groups and returned to baseline faster. Patients in the alloSCT group experienced the greatest symptom burden, greater decrease in performance status, largest short-term decline in QoL and slowest recovery. This study provides comprehensive data comparing QoL, PRO-AEs and cognition following CAR-T cell therapy versus autoSCT and alloSCT, and the first application of ToxT to PRO-CTCAE data. Short-term QOL, including physical and functional domains was better in the CAR-T group versus SCT groups, although all groups experienced an initial decline coinciding with peak symptoms. These data can serve as a guide for patient education, symptom management, and future studies in CAR-T cell therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.