Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35550440›Full record

ArticleTransplantation and cellular therapy2022

Longitudinal Patient Reported Outcomes with CAR-T Cell Therapy Versus Autologous and Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant.

Surbhi Sidana, Amylou C Dueck, Gita Thanarajasingam, Joan M Griffin, Carrie Thompson, Urshila Durani, Michelle Burtis, Rahma Warsame, Jonas Paludo, Morie A Gertz and 7 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transplantation and cellular therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Cancer-related cognitive impairment in patients with hematologic malignancies after CAR T cell therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Review
  4. Quality of Life in CAR-T Cell Therapy.Hematology reports · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Symptom distress evolution over the first year after allogeneic stem cell transplantation - a prospective observational sub-study of the SMILe project.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Observational
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Development of A Novel Scoring Index to Quantify the Need for Nutritional Support Interventions During Stem Cell Transplant and Gene Therapy in Children.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2025
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Surbhi SidanaDivision of BMT and Cellular Therapy, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California; Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. Electronic address: Surbhi.sidana@stanford.edu.
Amylou C DueckDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona.
Gita ThanarajasingamDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Joan M GriffinDivision of Health Care Delivery Research and Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Carrie ThompsonDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Urshila DuraniDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Michelle BurtisDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Rahma WarsameDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Jonas PaludoDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Morie A GertzDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Angela DispenzieriDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Stephen M AnsellDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
S Vincent RajkumarDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Kathleen YostDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Nora BennaniDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Yi LinDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Shaji KumarDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. Electronic address: kumar.shaji@mayo.edu.
Mayo Clinic · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · USMayo Clinic in Florida · US

Funding

Women's Cancer ProgramP30CA015083 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Lila J. Rutten · 1985 to 2026
$151.3M
Project 4: Targeting Resistance to T-Cell Directed Therapy in Multiple MyelomaP50CA186781 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ARIZONA · PI Yi Lin · 2015 to 2026
$25.5M
Paul Calabresi Program in Clinical/Translational Research at Mayo ClinicK12CA090628 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI WEROHA, SARAVUT · 2001 to 2025
$19.7M
Institutional Career Development Core (KL2)KL2TR003143 · NCATS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI ASCH, STEVEN M. · 2019 to 2023
$8.7M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR003143NCI NIH HHS K12 CA090628NCI NIH HHS P30 CA015083NCI NIH HHS P50 CA186781
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are limited data on patient experience after chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, especially in comparison to autologous and allogeneic transplantation, which are more established forms of cellular therapy. We prospectively evaluated longitudinal patient-reported quality of life (QoL), symptom burden and cognition after CAR-T cell therapy and compared it with prospective cohorts of patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation (autoSCT) and allogeneic SCT (alloSCT). This was a single center study. The primary endpoint was change in QoL. Secondary endpoints were patient-reported adverse events (PRO-AEs) measured by Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) and cognitive function (NeuroQOLv2 questionnaire). Time profile of PRO-AEs was evaluated using longitudinal analysis, Toxicity over Time (ToxT). Patients completed questionnaires at baseline, week 2 and monthly for 6 months. One hundred four patients were evaluable (CAR-T: 34, autoSCT: 33, alloSCT: 37). Baseline QoL was similar across groups. We observed a short-term decline in QoL in all groups that gradually returned to baseline. The nadir in QoL was at week 2 and coincided with peak in symptom burden. The decline in overall QoL, physical and functional well-being was significantly less with CAR-T versus SCT groups and returned to baseline faster. Patients in the alloSCT group experienced the greatest symptom burden, greater decrease in performance status, largest short-term decline in QoL and slowest recovery. This study provides comprehensive data comparing QoL, PRO-AEs and cognition following CAR-T cell therapy versus autoSCT and alloSCT, and the first application of ToxT to PRO-CTCAE data. Short-term QOL, including physical and functional domains was better in the CAR-T group versus SCT groups, although all groups experienced an initial decline coinciding with peak symptoms. These data can serve as a guide for patient education, symptom management, and future studies in CAR-T cell therapy.

Indexed as

Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationReceptors, Chimeric AntigenHumansPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresProspective StudiesQuality of LifeStem Cell TransplantationTransplantation, AutologousReceptors, Chimeric AntigenAdverse eventsCAR-T therapyChimeric antigen receptorCognitionPatient experiencePatient-reported outcomesQuality of life

Identifiers

PMID35550440
PMCPMC9357185
OpenAlexW4229377559

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.