Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35552152›Full record

ArticleIEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society2022

Design of a Wearable Vibrotactile Stimulation Device for Individuals With Upper-Limb Hemiparesis and Spasticity.

Caitlyn E Seim, Brandon Ritter, Thad E Starner, Kara Flavin, Maarten G Lansberg, Allison M Okamura

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07447934 (Vibrotactile Stimulation for Lower Limb Spasticity), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07447934 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Vibrotactile Stimulation for Lower Limb Spasticity

TypeinterventionalSponsorWeill Medical College of Cornell UniversityRan2026 to 2027Enrolled25ConditionsLower Limb SpasticityArmsVibrotactile Stimulation (Static Use), Vibrotactile Stimulation (Dynamic Use), Vibrotactile Stimulation (Neurophysiological Mechanism)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Caitlyn E Seim
Brandon Ritter
Thad E Starner
Kara Flavin
Maarten G Lansberg
Allison M Okamura
Stanford University · USGeorgia Institute of Technology · US

Funding

Developing a wearable computing device to provide vibrotactile stimulation for spasticity relief post-strokeF32HD100104 · NICHD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI SEIM, CAITLYN · 2019 to 2021
$130k
NICHD NIH HHS F32 HD100104
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vibratory stimulation may improve post-stroke symptoms such as spasticity; however, current studies are limited by the large, clinic-based apparatus used to apply this stimulation. A wearable device could provide vibratory stimulation in a mobile form, enabling further study of this technique. An initial device, the vibrotactile stimulation (VTS) Glove, was deployed in an eight-week clinical study in which sixteen individuals with stroke used the device for several hours daily. Participants reported wearing the glove during activities such as church, social events, and dining out. However, 69% of participants struggled to extend or insert their fingers to don the device. In a follow-up study, eight individuals with stroke evaluated new VTS device prototypes in a three-round iterative design study with the aims of creating the next generation of VTS devices and understanding features that influence interaction with a wearable device by individuals with impaired upper-limb function. Interviews and interaction tasks were used to define actionable design revisions between each round of evaluation. Our analysis identified six new themes from participants regarding device designs: hand supination is challenging, separate finger attachments inhibit fit and use, fingers may be flexed or open, fabric coverage impacts comfort, a reduced concern for social comfort, and the affected hand is infrequently used. Straps that wrap around the arm and fixtures on the anterior arm were other challenging features. We discuss potential accommodations for these challenges, as well as social comfort. New VTS device designs are presented and were donned in an average time of 48 seconds.

Indexed as

StrokeStroke RehabilitationWearable Electronic DevicesFollow-Up StudiesHumansMuscle SpasticityParesisUpper Extremity

Identifiers

PMID35552152
PMCPMC10139869
OpenAlexW4280641210

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.