Evidence mapPaperPMID 35558192Full record

ArticleSAGE open medicine2022

Trends in inequality in the coverage of vitamin A supplementation among children 6-59 months of age over two decades in Ethiopia: Evidence from demographic and health surveys.

Betregiorgis Zegeye, Comfort Z Olorunsaiye, Bright Opoku Ahinkorah, Edward Kwabena Ameyaw, Abdul-Aziz Seidu, Eugene Budu, Sanni Yaya

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SAGE open medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Betregiorgis ZegeyeHaSET Maternal and Child Health Research Program, Shewarobit Field Office, Shewarobit, Ethiopia.
Comfort Z OlorunsaiyeDepartment of Public Health, Arcadia University, Glenside, PA, USA.
Bright Opoku AhinkorahSchool of Public Health, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Edward Kwabena AmeyawSchool of Public Health, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Abdul-Aziz SeiduDepartment of Population and Health, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana.
Eugene BuduDepartment of Population and Health, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana.
Sanni YayaFaculty of Medicine, University of Parakou, Parakou, Benin.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6003-139X
University of Cape Coast · GHUniversity of Technology Sydney · AUArcadia University · USUniversité de Parakou · BJ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: There is a dearth of evidence on inequalities in vitamin A supplementation in Ethiopia. The goal of this study was to assess the magnitude and overtime changes of inequalities in vitamin A supplementation among children aged 6-59 months in Ethiopia. Methods: We extracted data from four waves of the Ethiopia Demographic and Health Surveys (2000, 2005, 2011, and 2016). The analysis was carried out using the 2019 updated World Health Organization's Health Equity Assessment Toolkit software that facilitates the use of stored data from World Health Organization's Health Equity Monitor Database. We conducted analysis of inequality in vitamin A supplementation by five equity stratifiers: household economic status, educational status, place of residence, child's sex, and subnational region. Four summary measures-population attributable fraction, ratio, difference, and population attributable risk-were assessed. We computed 95% uncertainty intervals for each point estimate to ascertain statistical significance of the observed vitamin A supplementation inequalities and overtime disparities. Results: The findings suggest marked absolute and relative pro-rich (population attributable fraction = 29.51, 95% uncertainty interval; 25.49-33.53, population attributable risk = 13.18, 95% uncertainty intervals; 11.38-14.98) and pro-urban (difference = 16.55, 95% uncertainty intervals; 11.23-21.87, population attributable fraction = 32.95, 95% uncertainty intervals; 32.12-33.78) inequalities. In addition, we found education-related (population attributable risk = 18.95, 95% uncertainty intervals; 18.22-19.67, ratio = 1.54, 95% uncertainty intervals; 1.37-1.71), and subnational regional (difference = 38.56, 95% uncertainty intervals; 29.57-47.54, ratio = 2.10, 95% uncertainty intervals; 1.66-2.54) inequalities that favored children from educated subgroups and those living in some regions such as Tigray. However, no sex-based inequalities were observed. While constant pattern was observed in subnational regional disparities, mixed but increasing patterns of socioeconomic and urban-rural inequalities were observed in the most recent surveys (2011-2016). Conclusion: In this study, we found extensive socioeconomic and geographic-based disparities that favored children from advantaged subgroups such as those whose mothers were educated, lived in the richest/richer households, resided in urban areas, and from regions like Tigray. Government policies and programs should prioritize underprivileged subpopulations and empower women as a means to increase national coverage and achieve universal accessibility of vitamin A supplementation.

Indexed as

demographic and health surveysEthiopiaglobal healthhealth inequalitiesVitamin A supplementation

Identifiers

PMID35558192
PMCPMC9087221
OpenAlexW4226341605

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.