ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2022
Causal Association Between Tea Consumption and Bone Health: A Mendelian Randomization Study.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Using Mendelian randomization analyses in osteoarthritis: state of art and future perspectives.Annals of medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Coffee and tea consumption on the risk of osteoporosis: a meta-analysis.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Pooled it
- Mendelian randomization studies of risk and protective factors for osteoporosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2024Pooled it
- No evidence of genetic causality between diabetes and osteonecrosis: a bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization analysis.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2023Pooled it
- [Exercise therapy and basic treatment for osteoporosis].Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023Guideline
- Causal association among smoking, bitter beverage consumption, and risk of osteoporosis: a two-sample mendelian randomization-based study.Hereditas · 2025Article
- Development and internal validation of a clinical prediction model for osteopenia in Chinese middle-aged and elderly men: a prospective cohort study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2024Article
- Diabetes and aortic dissection: unraveling the role of 3-hydroxybutyrate through mendelian randomization.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2024Article
- Does Walking Have an Association with Osteoarthritis? A Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization Analysis.Clinical interventions in aging · 2024Review
- Potential mechanism of tea for treating osteoporosis, osteoarthritis, and rheumatoid arthritis.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Review
- Gastrointestinal disease is an important influencing factor of osteoporosis fracture:a retrospective study in chinese postmenopausal women.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2023Article
- Testing relationship between tea intake and the risk of rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus: a Mendelian randomization study.Advances in rheumatology (London, England) · 2023Article
- Causal relationship between spondylarthritis and stroke in a European population: a two sample Mendelian randomization study.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Article
- Genetically predicted tea intake increases the risk of osteoarthritis: A Mendelian randomization study.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Much observational research reported that tea consumption decreases the risk of osteoarthritis (OA), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and osteoporosis (OP) which are the three major bone disorders. However, the observed correlation is inconclusive. To determine the causal relationship between genetically predicted tea intake and OA, RA, and OP, we performed a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) study based on large samples. Methods: The European population's genome-wide association meta-analysis (GWAS) dataset identified SNPs associated with tea consumption was obtained from Neale Lab's analysis of UK Biobank data that comprised 349,376 participants of European ancestry. We extracted genetic data for knee OA (17,885 controls and 4,462 cases), hip OA (50,898 controls and 12,625 cases), and RA (43,923 controls and 14,361 cases) from the UK Biobank and OP cases (93083 controls and 1,175 cases) from FinnGen Data Freeze 2. A MR study was conducted to examine the effect of selected single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and OA, RA, and OP risk. Several sensitivity analyses were performed with weighted median and inverse-variance weighted methods for estimating the causal effects. Results: In this MR study, the genetically predicted per one cup increase of tea consumption was not associated with knee OA (OR 1.11,95% CI: 0.79-1.55) using IVW with random effect. Genetic predisposition to tea consumption was not associated with hip OA (OR: 1.20, 95% CI: 0.84-1.71), RA (OR: 1.24 95% CI: 0.81-1.91), and OP (OR: 1.11, 95% CI: 0.89, 1.39). Following the sensitivity analysis, there was no potential pleiotropy. Conclusion: According to our study, According to our study, there was no statistical power to confirm a causal relationship between tea consumption and the risk of knee OA, hip OA, RA, and OP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.