Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35561510›Full record

SynthesisClinical psychology review2022

How do psychologically based interventions for chronic musculoskeletal pain work? A systematic review and meta-analysis of specific moderators and mediators of treatment.

Carlos Murillo, Tat-Thang Vo, Stijn Vansteelandt, Lauren E Harrison, Barbara Cagnie, Iris Coppieters, Marjolein Chys, Inge Timmers, Mira Meeus

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical psychology review, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Temporal pathways between alexithymia, psychological distress, and pain: An autoregressive mediation analysis.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Nondual Awareness as a Novel Chronic Pain Relieving Mechanism.Psychology of consciousness (Washington, D.C.) · 2026
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Carlos MurilloDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Ghent University, Belgium; Pain in Motion international research group, www.paininmotion.be, University of Antwerp, Campus Drie EikenUniversiteitsplein 12610 Wilrijk, Belgium.
Tat-Thang VoDepartment of Statistics, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania, United States; Department of Applied Mathematics, Computer Science and Statistics, Ghent University, Belgium.
Stijn VansteelandtDepartment of Applied Mathematics, Computer Science and Statistics, Ghent University, Belgium; Department of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, United Kingdom.
Lauren E HarrisonDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Stanford University, California, United States.
Barbara CagnieDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Ghent University, Belgium.
Iris CoppietersDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Ghent University, Belgium; Pain in Motion international research group, www.paininmotion.be, University of Antwerp, Campus Drie EikenUniversiteitsplein 12610 Wilrijk, Belgium; Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium.
Marjolein ChysDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Ghent University, Belgium.
Inge TimmersDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Ghent University, Belgium; Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Stanford University, California, United States; Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Maastricht University, Netherlands.
Mira MeeusDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Ghent University, Belgium; Pain in Motion international research group, www.paininmotion.be, University of Antwerp, Campus Drie EikenUniversiteitsplein 12610 Wilrijk, Belgium; MOVANT research group, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Antwerp, Belgium. Electronic address: mira.meeus@uantwerpen.be.

Funding

Agile Development of a Digital Exposure Treatment for Youth with Chronic Musculoskeletal PainK23AR079608 · NIAMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI HARRISON, LAUREN ELISABETH · 2021 to 2025
$762k
NIAMS NIH HHS K23 AR079608
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Psychologically based interventions aim to improve pain-related functioning by targeting pain-related fears, cognitions and behaviors. Mediation and moderation analyses permit further examination of the effect of treatment on an outcome. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to synthetize the evidence of specific mediators and moderators (i.e., treatment targets) of psychologically based treatment effects on pain and disability. A total of 28 mediation and 11 moderation analyses were included. Thirteen mediation studies were included in a meta-analysis, and the rest was narratively synthetized. Reductions in pain-related fear (indirect effect [IE]: -0.07; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.11, -0.04) and catastrophizing (IE: -0.07; 95%CI: -0.14, -0.00), as well as increases in self-efficacy (IE: -0.07; 95%CI: -0.11, -0.04), mediated effects of cognitive behavioral therapy on disability but not on pain intensity, when compared to control treatments. Enhancing pain acceptance (IE: -0.17; 95%CI: -0.31, -0.03) and psychological flexibility (IE: -0.30; 95%CI: -0.41, -0.18) mediated acceptance and commitment therapy effects on disability. The narrative synthesis showed conflicting evidence, which did not support a robust moderated effect for any of the examined constructs. Overall, the methodological quality regarding mediation was low, and some key pitfalls are highlighted alongside recommendations to provide a platform for future research.

Indexed as

Acceptance and Commitment TherapyChronic PainCognitive Behavioral TherapyMusculoskeletal PainHumansSelf EfficacyChronic musculoskeletal painMediation analysismeta-analysisModeration analysisPsychologically based interventionsSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID35561510
PMCPMC11146991

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.