Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35562890›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2022

Scaffold Pore Curvature Influences ΜSC Fate through Differential Cellular Organization and YAP/TAZ Activity.

W Benton Swanson, Maiko Omi, Seth M Woodbury, Lindsey M Douglas, Miranda Eberle, Peter X Ma, Nan E Hatch, Yuji Mishina

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Mechanobiological optimization of scaffolds for bone tissue engineering.Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology · 2024
    Article
  11. Biomedicines · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Next-generation biomaterials for dental pulp tissue immunomodulation.Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

W Benton SwansonDepartment of Biologic and Materials Science, Division of Prosthodontics, University of Michigan School of Dentistry, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8074-7117
Maiko OmiDepartment of Biologic and Materials Science, Division of Prosthodontics, University of Michigan School of Dentistry, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Seth M WoodburyDepartment of Biologic and Materials Science, Division of Prosthodontics, University of Michigan School of Dentistry, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0510-8240
Lindsey M DouglasDepartment of Biologic and Materials Science, Division of Prosthodontics, University of Michigan School of Dentistry, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Miranda EberleDepartment of Biologic and Materials Science, Division of Prosthodontics, University of Michigan School of Dentistry, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Peter X MaDepartment of Biologic and Materials Science, Division of Prosthodontics, University of Michigan School of Dentistry, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0191-9487
Nan E HatchDepartment of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, University of Michigan School of Dentistry, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2632-0841
Yuji MishinaDepartment of Biologic and Materials Science, Division of Prosthodontics, University of Michigan School of Dentistry, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6268-4204
University of Michigan · US

Funding

Tissue Engineering and RegenerationT32DE007057 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI DAVID H. KOHN · 1985 to 2026
$17.3M
Regenerating cranial suture (Jaylynn Jones)R01DE027662 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI HATCH, NAN E, MA, PETER X · 2018 to 2022
$2.6M
Exosome-mediated Craniofacial Bone Tissue Engineering by Controlled ReleaseF30DE029359 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI SWANSON, WILLIAM BENTON · 2020 to 2024
$231k
NIDCR NIH HHS DE007057NIDCR NIH HHS DE027662NIDCR NIH HHS DE029359NIDCR NIH HHS F30 DE029359NIDCR NIH HHS T32 DE007057
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tissue engineering aims to repair, restore, and/or replace tissues in the human body as an alternative to grafts and prostheses. Biomaterial scaffolds can be utilized to provide a three-dimensional microenvironment to facilitate tissue regeneration. Previously, we reported that scaffold pore size influences vascularization and extracellular matrix composition both in vivo and in vitro, to ultimately influence tissue phenotype for regenerating cranial suture and bone tissues, which have markedly different tissue properties despite similar multipotent stem cell populations. To rationally design biomaterials for specific cell and tissue fate specification, it is critical to understand the molecular processes governed by cell-biomaterial interactions, which guide cell fate specification. Building on our previous work, in this report we investigated the hypothesis that scaffold pore curvature, the direct consequence of pore size, modulates the differentiation trajectory of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) through alterations in the cytoskeleton. First, we demonstrated that sufficiently small pores facilitate cell clustering in subcutaneous explants cultured in vivo, which we previously reported to demonstrate stem tissue phenotype both in vivo and in vitro. Based on this observation, we cultured cell-scaffold constructs in vitro to assess early time point interactions between cells and the matrix as a function of pore size. We demonstrate that principle curvature directly influences nuclear aspect and cell aggregation in vitro. Scaffold pores with a sufficiently low degree of principle curvature enables cell differentiation; pharmacologic inhibition of actin cytoskeleton polymerization in these scaffolds decreased differentiation, indicating a critical role of the cytoskeleton in transducing cues from the scaffold pore microenvironment to the cell nucleus. We fabricated a macropore model, which allows for three-dimensional confocal imaging and demonstrates that a higher principle curvature facilitates cell aggregation and the formation of a potentially protective niche within scaffold macropores which prevents MSC differentiation and retains their stemness. Sufficiently high principle curvature upregulates yes-associated protein (YAP) phosphorylation while decreased principle curvature downregulates YAP phosphorylation and increases YAP nuclear translocation with subsequent transcriptional activation towards an osteogenic differentiation fate. Finally, we demonstrate that the inhibition of the YAP/TAZ pathway causes a defect in differentiation, while YAP/TAZ activation causes premature differentiation in a curvature-dependent way when modulated by verteporfin (VP) and 1-oleyl-lysophosphatidic acid (LPA), respectively, confirming the critical role of biomaterials-mediated YAP/TAZ signaling in cell differentiation and fate specification. Our data support that the principle curvature of scaffold macropores is a critical design criterion which guides the differentiation trajectory of mesenchymal stem cells' scaffolds. Biomaterial-mediated regulation of YAP/TAZ may significantly contribute to influencing the regenerative outcomes of biomaterials-based tissue engineering strategies through their specific pore design.

Indexed as

Mesenchymal Stem CellsOsteogenesisBiocompatible MaterialsCell DifferentiationTissue EngineeringBiocompatible Materialsmechanotransductionmesenchymal stem cellregenerative medicinescaffoldstissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID35562890
PMCPMC9102667
OpenAlexW4224269733

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.