Evidence mapPaperPMID 35563540Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2022

Clinical Parameters and Epigenetic Biomarkers of Plaque Vulnerability in Patients with Carotid Stenosis.

Laia Carballo-Perich, Dolors Puigoriol-Illamola, Saima Bashir, Mikel Terceño, Yolanda Silva, Carme Gubern-Mérida, Joaquín Serena

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Vulnerable Atherosclerotic Plaque: Is There a Molecular Signature?International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Laia Carballo-PerichCerebrovascular Pathology Research Group, Girona Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBGI), RICORS-ICTUS, Parc Hospitalari Martí I Julià, Edifici M2, 17190 Salt, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1843-7660
Dolors Puigoriol-IllamolaCerebrovascular Pathology Research Group, Girona Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBGI), RICORS-ICTUS, Parc Hospitalari Martí I Julià, Edifici M2, 17190 Salt, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1520-8352
Saima BashirCerebrovascular Pathology Research Group, Stroke Unit, Department of Neurology, Girona Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBGI), Dr. Josep Trueta University Hospital, RICORS-ICTUS, Av. França s/n (7a Planta), 17007 Girona, Spain.
Mikel TerceñoCerebrovascular Pathology Research Group, Stroke Unit, Department of Neurology, Girona Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBGI), Dr. Josep Trueta University Hospital, RICORS-ICTUS, Av. França s/n (7a Planta), 17007 Girona, Spain.
Yolanda SilvaCerebrovascular Pathology Research Group, Stroke Unit, Department of Neurology, Girona Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBGI), Dr. Josep Trueta University Hospital, RICORS-ICTUS, Av. França s/n (7a Planta), 17007 Girona, Spain.
Carme Gubern-MéridaCerebrovascular Pathology Research Group, Girona Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBGI), RICORS-ICTUS, Parc Hospitalari Martí I Julià, Edifici M2, 17190 Salt, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8378-4477
Joaquín SerenaCerebrovascular Pathology Research Group, Stroke Unit, Department of Neurology, Girona Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBGI), Dr. Josep Trueta University Hospital, RICORS-ICTUS, Av. França s/n (7a Planta), 17007 Girona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4478-7744
Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Girona · ES

Funding

Instituto de Salud Carlos III RD21/0006/0011
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Atheromatous disease is the first cause of death and dependency in developed countries and carotid artery atherosclerosis is one of the main causes of severe ischaemic strokes. Current management strategies are mainly based on the degree of stenosis and patient selection has limited accuracy. This information could be complemented by the identification of biomarkers of plaque vulnerability, which would permit patients at greater and lesser risk of stroke to be distinguished, thus enabling a better selection of patients for surgical or intensive medical treatment. Although several circulating protein-based biomarkers with significance for both the diagnosis of carotid artery disease and its prognosis have been identified, at present, none have been clinically implemented. This review focuses especially on the most relevant clinical parameters to take into account in routine clinical practice and summarises the most up-to-date data on epigenetic biomarkers of carotid atherosclerosis and plaque vulnerability.

Indexed as

Carotid Artery DiseasesCarotid StenosisPlaque, AtheroscleroticStrokeBiomarkersCarotid ArteriesEpigenesis, GeneticHumansPlaque, AmyloidBiomarkersatherosclerosisbiomarkercarotid artery stenosisepigeneticsneuroimagingstrokevulnerable plaque

Identifiers

PMID35563540
PMCPMC9101730
OpenAlexW4229076920

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.