ArticleCells2022
Identifying Blood Biomarkers for Dementia Using Machine Learning Methods in the Framingham Heart Study.
Article in Cells, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Explainable machine learning for the prediction of Alzheimer's disease-related cognitive impairment: a consensus feature selection approach.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence-driven multi-omics approaches in Alzheimer's disease: Progress, challenges, and future directions.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2025Review
- PPIxGPN: plasma proteomic profiling of neurodegenerative biomarkers with protein-protein interaction-based eXplainable graph propagational network.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Development and interpretation of a machine learning predictive model for early cognitive impairment in hypertension associated with environmental factors.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Mapping Knowledge Landscapes and Emerging Trends in AI for Dementia Biomarkers: Bibliometric and Visualization Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
- SingPro: a knowledge base providing single-cell proteomic data.Nucleic acids research · 2024Article
- Artificial intelligence for dementia prevention.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2023Review
- Blood-Based Proteomic Profiling Identifies Potential Biomarker Candidates and Pathogenic Pathways in Dementia.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Neuropsychiatric Symptoms and Commonly Used Biomarkers of Alzheimer's Disease: A Literature Review from a Machine Learning Perspective.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2023Review
- White Blood Cell and Platelet Counts Are Not Suitable as Biomarkers in the Differential Diagnostics of Dementia.Brain sciences · 2022Article
- What's New in Dementia Risk Prediction Modelling? An Updated Systematic Review.Dementia and geriatric cognitive disorders extraReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Blood biomarkers for dementia have the potential to identify preclinical disease and improve participant selection for clinical trials. Machine learning is an efficient analytical strategy to simultaneously identify multiple candidate biomarkers for dementia. We aimed to identify important candidate blood biomarkers for dementia using three machine learning models. We included 1642 (mean 69 ± 6 yr, 53% women) dementia-free Framingham Offspring Cohort participants attending examination, 7 who had available blood biomarker data. We developed three machine learning models, support vector machine (SVM), eXtreme gradient boosting of decision trees (XGB), and artificial neural network (ANN), to identify candidate biomarkers for incident dementia. Over a mean 12 ± 5 yr follow-up, 243 (14.8%) participants developed dementia. In multivariable models including all 38 available biomarkers, the XGB model demonstrated the strongest predictive accuracy for incident dementia (AUC 0.74 ± 0.01), followed by ANN (AUC 0.72 ± 0.01), and SVM (AUC 0.69 ± 0.01). Stepwise feature elimination by random sampling identified a subset of the nine most highly informative biomarkers. Machine learning models confined to these nine biomarkers showed improved model predictive accuracy for dementia (XGB, AUC 0.76 ± 0.01; ANN, AUC 0.75 ± 0.004; SVM, AUC 0.73 ± 0.01). A parsimonious panel of nine candidate biomarkers were identified which showed moderately good predictive accuracy for incident dementia, although our results require external validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.