Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35563811›Full record

ArticleCells2022

Identifying Blood Biomarkers for Dementia Using Machine Learning Methods in the Framingham Heart Study.

Honghuang Lin, Jayandra J Himali, Claudia L Satizabal, Alexa S Beiser, Daniel Levy, Emelia J Benjamin, Mitzi M Gonzales, Saptaparni Ghosh, Ramachandran S Vasan, Sudha Seshadri and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cells, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Artificial intelligence for dementia prevention.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Honghuang LinThe Framingham Heart Study, Framingham, MA 01701, USA.
Jayandra J HimaliThe Framingham Heart Study, Framingham, MA 01701, USA.
Claudia L SatizabalThe Framingham Heart Study, Framingham, MA 01701, USA.
Alexa S BeiserThe Framingham Heart Study, Framingham, MA 01701, USA.
Daniel LevyThe Framingham Heart Study, Framingham, MA 01701, USA.
Emelia J BenjaminThe Framingham Heart Study, Framingham, MA 01701, USA.
Mitzi M GonzalesThe Framingham Heart Study, Framingham, MA 01701, USA.
Saptaparni GhoshThe Framingham Heart Study, Framingham, MA 01701, USA.
Ramachandran S VasanThe Framingham Heart Study, Framingham, MA 01701, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7357-5970
Sudha SeshadriThe Framingham Heart Study, Framingham, MA 01701, USA.
Emer R McGrathThe Framingham Heart Study, Framingham, MA 01701, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3589-2964

Funding

FRAMINGHAM HEART STUDY - YEAR 5 EXAM75N92019D00031 · NHLBI · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · 2019 to 2024
$29.8M
PRECURSORS OF STROKE INCIDENCE AND PROGNOSISR01NS017950 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI Hugo Javier Aparicio, Jose Rafael Romero · 1985 to 2026
$22.9M
IDENTIFICATION OF COMMON GENETIC VARIANTS FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION AND PR INTERVALR01HL092577 · NHLBI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI BENJAMIN, EMELIA J., ELLINOR, PATRICK THOMAS · 2009 to 2025
$20.6M
VCID Biomarkers Coordinating CenterU24NS100591 · NINDS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI Steven M Greenberg · 2016 to 2026
$19.8M
EPIDEMIOLOGY OF DEMENTIA IN THE FRAMINGHAM STUDYR01AG008122 · NIA · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI AU, RHODA, SESHADRI, SUDHA · 1989 to 2015
$14.4M
San Antonio OAIC - Research Education Component (REC)P30AG044271 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI Adam Salmon · 2015 to 2026
$14.1M
Temporal Trends, Novel Imaging and Molecular Characterization of Preclinical and Clinical Alzheimer's Disease in the Framingham CohortsR01AG054076 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI DECARLI, CHARLES, SESHADRI, SUDHA · 2016 to 2020
$12.3M
Multidimensional Assessment of Brain Health as A Marker of Dementia Risk and ResilienceR01AG066524 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI KASHANI, AMIR H, RAMACHANDRAN, VASAN S · 2020 to 2024
$9.7M
Cognitively Healthy Nonagenarians in the Cross Cohort Collaboration (CCC)RF1AG059421 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI SESHADRI, SUDHA · 2018 to 2018
$6.1M
Collaborative GWAS of Dementia, AD and related MRI and Cognitive EndophenotypesR01AG033193 · NIA · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI SESHADRI, SUDHA · 2009 to 2016
$4.4M
Framingham: Inflammation, Genes &Cardiovascular DiseaseR01HL076784 · NHLBI · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI BENJAMIN, EMELIA J. · 2004 to 2008
$3.9M
VASOACTIVE PEPTIDES WHICH STIMULATE SMOOTH MUSCLESR01HL036473 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI ERDOS, ERVIN G, SKIDGEL, RANDAL A · 1985 to 2010
$3.4M
NHLBI NIH HHS 75N92019D00031NHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201500001CNHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201500001INHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL036473NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL076784NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL092577NIA NIH HHS P30 AG044271NIA NIH HHS R01 AG008122NIA NIH HHS R01 AG028321NIA NIH HHS R01 AG033193NIA NIH HHS R01 AG049607NIA NIH HHS R01 AG054076NIA NIH HHS R01 AG066524NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG059421NIA NIH HHS U01 AG049505NIA NIH HHS U01 AG052409NIA NIH HHS U01 AG068221NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS017950NINDS NIH HHS U24 NS100591NINDS NIH HHS UH2 NS100605
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Blood biomarkers for dementia have the potential to identify preclinical disease and improve participant selection for clinical trials. Machine learning is an efficient analytical strategy to simultaneously identify multiple candidate biomarkers for dementia. We aimed to identify important candidate blood biomarkers for dementia using three machine learning models. We included 1642 (mean 69 ± 6 yr, 53% women) dementia-free Framingham Offspring Cohort participants attending examination, 7 who had available blood biomarker data. We developed three machine learning models, support vector machine (SVM), eXtreme gradient boosting of decision trees (XGB), and artificial neural network (ANN), to identify candidate biomarkers for incident dementia. Over a mean 12 ± 5 yr follow-up, 243 (14.8%) participants developed dementia. In multivariable models including all 38 available biomarkers, the XGB model demonstrated the strongest predictive accuracy for incident dementia (AUC 0.74 ± 0.01), followed by ANN (AUC 0.72 ± 0.01), and SVM (AUC 0.69 ± 0.01). Stepwise feature elimination by random sampling identified a subset of the nine most highly informative biomarkers. Machine learning models confined to these nine biomarkers showed improved model predictive accuracy for dementia (XGB, AUC 0.76 ± 0.01; ANN, AUC 0.75 ± 0.004; SVM, AUC 0.73 ± 0.01). A parsimonious panel of nine candidate biomarkers were identified which showed moderately good predictive accuracy for incident dementia, although our results require external validation.

Indexed as

DementiaMachine LearningBiomarkersFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleNeural Networks, ComputerBiomarkersbiomarkersblood biomarkersdementiamachine learningrisk prediction

Identifiers

PMID35563811
PMCPMC9100323

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.