Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35568819›Full record

ArticleClinical proteomics2022

Optimized sample preparation and data analysis for TMT proteomic analysis of cerebrospinal fluid applied to the identification of Alzheimer's disease biomarkers.

Sophia Weiner, Mathias Sauer, Pieter Jelle Visser, Betty M Tijms, Egor Vorontsov, Kaj Blennow, Henrik Zetterberg, Johan Gobom

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical proteomics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Sophia WeinerDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden. sophia.weiner@gu.se.
Mathias SauerClinical Neurochemistry Lab, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden.
Pieter Jelle VisserDepartment of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Alzheimer Centrum Limburg, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Betty M TijmsDepartment of Neurology, Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neurosciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Egor VorontsovProteomics Core Facility, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Kaj BlennowDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden.
Henrik ZetterbergDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden.
Johan GobomDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden.
Sahlgrenska University Hospital · SEUniversity of Gothenburg · SEAmsterdam Neuroscience · NLMaastricht University · NL

Funding

The effects of iron on oxidative stress and Alzheimer's biomarkers in amyloid-positive and negative elderly normalR01AG068398 · NIA · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI CHIANG, GLORIA CHIA-YI · 2020 to 2024
$2.8M
AD Strategic Fund and the Alzheimer's Association ADSF-21-831376-CÅhléns-stiftelsen K8020071398ALF-agreement ALFGBG-715986Alzheimer Drug Discovery Foundation 201809-2016862Alzheimerfonden AF-930934Alzheimer's Association 2021 Zenith Award ZEN-21-848495Alzheimer's Drug Discovery Foundation RDAPB-201809-2016615EU/EFPIA Innovative Medicines Initiative Joint Undertaking 115372European Research Council 681712European Union Joint Program for Neurodegenerative Disorders JPND2019-466-236European Union Joint Program for Neurodegenerative Disorders JPND2021-00694Gun och Bertil Stohnes Stiftelse K8020065655Hjärnfonden FO2017-0243Hjärnfonden FO2019-0228MIRIADE 860197NIA NIH HHS R01 AG068398NIH HHS 1R01AG068398-01Swedish Alzheimer Foundation AF-930351Swedish Research Council 2017-00915Swedish Research Council 2018-02532Swedish State Support for Clinical Research ALFGBG-720931ZonMw 733050824736
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is an important biofluid for biomarkers of neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer's disease (AD). By employing tandem mass tag (TMT) proteomics, thousands of proteins can be quantified simultaneously in large cohorts, making it a powerful tool for biomarker discovery. However, TMT proteomics in CSF is associated with analytical challenges regarding sample preparation and data processing. In this study we address those challenges ranging from data normalization over sample preparation to sample analysis.

methodUsing liquid chromatography coupled to mass-spectrometry (LC-MS), we analyzed TMT multiplex samples consisting of either identical or individual CSF samples, evaluated quantification accuracy and tested the performance of different data normalization approaches. We examined MS2 and MS3 acquisition strategies regarding accuracy of quantification and performed a comparative evaluation of filter-assisted sample preparation (FASP) and an in-solution protocol. Finally, four normalization approaches (median, quantile, Total Peptide Amount, TAMPOR) were applied to the previously published European Medical Information Framework Alzheimer's Disease Multimodal Biomarker Discovery (EMIF-AD MBD) dataset.

resultsThe correlation of measured TMT reporter ratios with spiked-in standard peptide amounts was significantly lower for TMT multiplexes composed of individual CSF samples compared with those composed of aliquots of a single CSF pool, demonstrating that the heterogeneous CSF sample composition influences TMT quantitation. Comparison of TMT reporter normalization methods showed that the correlation could be improved by applying median- and quantile-based normalization. The slope was improved by acquiring data in MS3 mode, albeit at the expense of a 29% decrease in the number of identified proteins. FASP and in-solution sample preparation of CSF samples showed a 73% overlap in identified proteins. Finally, using optimized data normalization, we present a list of 64 biomarker candidates (clinical AD vs. controls, p < 0.01) identified in the EMIF-AD cohort.

conclusionWe have evaluated several analytical aspects of TMT proteomics in CSF. The results of our study provide practical guidelines to improve the accuracy of quantification and aid in the design of sample preparation and analytical protocol. The AD biomarker list extracted from the EMIF-AD cohort can provide a valuable basis for future biomarker studies and help elucidate pathogenic mechanisms in AD.

Indexed as

Alzheimer’s diseaseBiomarkersCerebrospinal fluidLabeling efficiencyMass spectrometryNormalizationSample preparationTandem mass tag

Identifiers

PMID35568819
PMCPMC9107710
OpenAlexW4280620935

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.