Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35571167›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2022

The Protective Effect of Sevoflurane Conditionings Against Myocardial Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Preclinical Trials in

Bin Hu, Tian Tian, Pei-Pei Hao, Wei-Chao Liu, Ying-Gui Chen, Tian-Yu Jiang, Fu-Shan Xue

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Inhaled Anesthetics: Beyond the Operating Room.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Bin HuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Tian TianDepartment of Anesthesiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Pei-Pei HaoDepartment of Anesthesiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Wei-Chao LiuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Ying-Gui ChenDepartment of Anesthesiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Tian-Yu JiangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Fu-Shan XueDepartment of Anesthesiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Beijing Friendship Hospital · CNCapital Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury (IRI) is a common and serious complication in clinical practice. Sevoflurane conditionings have been identified to provide a protection against myocardial IRI in animal experiments, but their true clinical benefits remain controversial. Here, we aimed to analyze the preclinical evidences obtained in animal models of myocardial IRI and explore the possible reasons for controversial clinical benefits. Methods: Our primary outcome was the difference in mean infarct size between the sevoflurane and control groups in animal models of myocardial IRI. After searching the databases of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library, a systematic review retrieved 37 eligible studies, from which 28 studies controlled comparisons of sevoflurane preconditioning (SPreC) and 40 studies controlled comparisons of sevoflurane postconditioning (SPostC) that were made in a pooled random-effects meta-analysis. In total, this analysis included data from 313 control animals and 536 animals subject to sevoflurane conditionings. Results: Pooled estimates for primary outcome demonstrated that sevoflurane could significantly reduce the infarct size after myocardial IRI whether preconditioning [weighted mean difference (WMD): -18.56, 95% CI: -23.27 to -13.85, Conclusion: Sevoflurane conditionings can significantly reduce infarct size in

Indexed as

infarct sizemeta-analysismyocardial ischemia/reperfusion injurypostconditioningpre-clinical trialspreconditioningsevoflurane

Identifiers

PMID35571167
PMCPMC9095933
OpenAlexW4224986250

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.