Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35571390›Full record

ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2022

The diagnostic value of endoplasmic reticulum stress-related specific proteins GRP78 and CHOP in patients with sepsis: a diagnostic cohort study.

Fangfang Li, Qionghua Lin, Lihua Shen, Zhongwei Zhang, Pengmei Wang, Shan Zhang, Qian Xing, Zhili Xia, Zhiyong Zhao, Yunhe Zhang and 1 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Fangfang LiDepartment of Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Qionghua LinDepartment of Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Lihua ShenDepartment of Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Zhongwei ZhangDepartment of Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Pengmei WangDepartment of Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Shan ZhangDepartment of Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Qian XingDepartment of Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Zhili XiaDepartment of Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Zhiyong ZhaoDepartment of Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Yunhe ZhangDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Biao ZhuDepartment of Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center · CNShanghai East Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Sepsis is a life-threatening disease with high mortality. Early diagnosis is critical as early treatment improves outcomes. The protein levels of glucose regulated protein 78 (GRP78) and C/EBP homologous protein (CHOP), markers of endoplasmic reticulum stress (ERS) activation, were reported increasing rapidly and continuously in the serum of patients with sepsis. Therefore, they might serve as a potential biomarker for sepsis diagnosis. This study aimed to analyze the role of GRP78 and CHOP in the diagnosis of patients with sepsis. Methods: This study enrolled a total of 92 infected patients with or without sepsis who were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) from February 1, 2018 to September 30, 2018. According to 2016 SCCM/ESICM Sepsis 3.0 diagnostic criteria, patients with sepsis were allocated into group I (sepsis infected group) and patients without sepsis were allocated into group II (non-sepsis infected group). Serum samples were collected on days 1, 2, 3, and 7 after admission to ICU, and the concentrations of GRP78 and CHOP in the serum were analyzed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The diagnostic ability of GRP78, CHOP, and other traditional inflammatory markers was assessed with receiver operating characteristic (ROC)/area under the ROC curves (AUC) analysis. Patients were shortly follow-up for the 28-day mortality. Results: Serum GRP78 and CHOP levels in group I patients were higher than that in group II patients (P=0.021, P=0.00, respectively). When GRP78 was used to diagnose sepsis, the maximum area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.771 (95% CI: 0.662-0.880) and the optimal threshold was 157.29 ng/L (sensitivity, 75.0%; specificity, 73.1%) on day 2. When CHOP was used for the diagnosis of sepsis, the maximum AUC was 0.813(95% CI: 0.721-0.906) and the optimal threshold was 4.915 ng/L (sensitivity, 57.7%; specificity, 96.2%) on day 2. Conclusions: Compared with traditional inflammatory markers, ERS-related specific proteins GRP78 and CHOP have better sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of sepsis, which is helpful for clinicians in the diagnosis of sepsis.

Indexed as

C/EBP homologous protein (CHOP)glucose-regulated protein 78 (GRP78)Sepsis

Identifiers

PMID35571390
PMCPMC9096362
OpenAlexW4280591470

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.