Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35574429›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in gastroenterology2022

Cost-effectiveness analysis of ferric carboxymaltose

Federico Argüelles-Arias, Fernando Bermejo, Joaquín Borrás-Blasco, Eugeni Domènech, Beatriz Sicilia, José M Huguet, Antonio Ramirez de Arellano, William J Valentine, Barnaby Hunt

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Federico Argüelles-AriasHospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Seville, Spain; Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Sevilla, Seville, Spain.
Fernando BermejoHospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital La Paz (IdiPAZ), Madrid, Spain.
Joaquín Borrás-BlascoHospital de Sagunto, Valencia, Spain.
Eugeni DomènechHospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain; CIBEREHD, Madrid, Spain.
Beatriz SiciliaHospital Universitario de Burgos, Burgos, Spain.
José M HuguetHospital General Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Antonio Ramirez de ArellanoHEOR, Vifor Pharma Group, Glattbrugg, Switzerland.
William J ValentineOssian Health Economics and Communications GmbH, Basel, Switzerland.
Barnaby HuntOssian Health Economics and Communications GmbH, Bäumleingasse 20, 4051 Basel, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5420-279X
Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red · ESHospital de Sagunto · ESHospital General Universitario De Valencia · ESHospital Universitario de Burgos · ESHospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada · ESHospital Universitario Virgen Macarena · ESVifor Pharma (Switzerland) · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is a common complication of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and can result in reduced quality of life and increased healthcare costs. IDA is treated with iron supplementation, commonly with intravenous iron formulations, such as ferric carboxymaltose (FCM), and iron sucrose (IS). Methods: This study assessed the cost-effectiveness of FCM compared with IS, in terms of additional cost per additional responder in patients with IDA subsequent to IBD in the Spanish setting. An economic model was developed to assess the additional cost per additional responder, defined as normalization or an increase of ⩾2 g/dl in hemoglobin levels, for FCM Results: FCM was more effective than IS, with 84% of patients achieving a response compared with 76%. When expressed as number needed to treat, 13 patients would need to switch treatment from IS to FCM in order to achieve one additional responder. Costs of treatment were EUR 323 with FCM compared with EUR 470 with IS, a cost saving of EUR 147 with FCM. Cost savings with FCM were driven by the reduced number of infusions required, resulting in a reduced requirement for healthcare professional time and use of consumables compared with the IS arm. Conclusion: The present analysis suggests that FCM is less costly and more effective than IS for the treatment of IDA subsequent to IBD in Spain and therefore was considered dominant.

Indexed as

costcost-effectivenessinflammatory bowel diseaseiron deficiency anemia

Identifiers

PMID35574429
PMCPMC9092579
OpenAlexW4285251782

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.