Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35576389›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of surgery2022

Core outcome set for symptomatic uncomplicated gallstone disease.

Karen Innes, Jemma Hudson, Katie Banister, Bernard Croal, Craig Ramsay, Irfan Ahmed, Jane Blazeby, Katie Gillies

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Comment on: An International Expert Delphi Consensus on Defining Textbook Outcome in Liver Surgery (TOLS).Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Karen InnesHealth Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen Institute of Applied Health Sciences, Aberdeen, UK.
Jemma HudsonHealth Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen Institute of Applied Health Sciences, Aberdeen, UK.
Katie BanisterHealth Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen Institute of Applied Health Sciences, Aberdeen, UK.
Bernard CroalClinical Biochemistry, Grampian University Hospitals NHS Trust, Aberdeen, UK.
Craig RamsayHealth Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen Institute of Applied Health Sciences, Aberdeen, UK.
Irfan AhmedDepartment of Surgery, NHS Grampian, Aberdeen, UK.
Jane BlazebyDepartment of Social Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3354-3330
Katie GilliesHealth Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen Institute of Applied Health Sciences, Aberdeen, UK.
University of Aberdeen · GBNHS Grampian · GBUniversity of Bristol · GB

Funding

Chief Scientist Office HSRU1Medical Research Council MR/K025643/1Medical Research Council MR/L01193X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHeterogeneity of outcomes is a problem for assessing intervention effectiveness when considering treatments for uncomplicated symptomatic gallstone disease. The value to all stakeholders of outcomes that have been measured and reported to date is also unclear. The aim of this study was to develop a core outcome set for symptomatic uncomplicated gallstone disease.

methodsAn in person-meeting was held with patients to prioritize potentially important outcomes from a previously developed longlist of outcomes. This was followed by an online three-round Delphi survey that was conducted with healthcare professionals. The results of each consensus process were compared and combined to produce the final core outcome set.

resultsA total of 82 participants enrolled in round 1 of the Delphi survey, with a final sample of 40 participants contributing to round 3. Five patients contributed to the in-person group meeting. Following the consensus processes, 11 outcomes were considered to be core by patients and healthcare professionals, and included in the core outcome set. These were: quality of life; overall health state; overall satisfaction; overall pain; common bile duct injury; biliary leak; haemorrhage; need for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; intra-abdominal collections; admission/readmission for problems; and reoperation.

conclusionA core outcome set for symptomatic uncomplicated gallstone disease has been developed with patients and healthcare professionals. Eleven outcomes across four key domains have been identified. These represent the minimum set of outcomes that should be reported in trials evaluating interventions for gallstone disease.

Indexed as

CholelithiasisQuality of LifeConsensusDelphi TechniqueHumansOutcome Assessment, Health CareResearch DesignTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID35576389
PMCPMC10364745
OpenAlexW4226219265

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.