Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35577966›Full record

Trial reportNature medicine2022

Electronic cigarettes versus nicotine patches for smoking cessation in pregnancy: a randomized controlled trial.

Peter Hajek, Dunja Przulj, Francesca Pesola, Chris Griffiths, Robert Walton, Hayden McRobbie, Tim Coleman, Sarah Lewis, Rachel Whitemore, Miranda Clark and 9 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nature medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 39 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
8.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  10. Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  11. Patterns of e-Cigarette Use and Smoking Cessation Outcomes: Secondary Analysis of a Large Randomised Controlled Trial to Inform Clinical Advice.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2026
    Trial
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Toxicant and Nicotine Exposure in Pregnant Smokers, Vapers, and Nicotine-Replacement Users: Cross-Sectional Study.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Cigarette Smoking Relapse Among People Who Switched to E-cigarettes or Other Tobacco Products.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Peter HajekWolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9160-4296
Dunja PrzuljWolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1133-8835
Francesca PesolaWolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK. f.pesola@qmul.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2054-7930
Chris GriffithsWolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7935-8694
Robert WaltonWolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Hayden McRobbieNational Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7777-1845
Tim ColemanFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7303-4805
Sarah LewisFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5308-6619
Rachel WhitemoreFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Miranda ClarkFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6179-046X
Michael UssherDivision of Population Heath Sciences and Education, St Georges, University of London, London, UK.
Lesley SinclairUsher Institute and SPECTRUM Consortium, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2210-8181
Emily SeagerWolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Sue CooperFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Linda BauldUsher Institute and SPECTRUM Consortium, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7411-4260
Felix NaughtonSchool of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Peter SasieniThe Cancer Research UK and King's College London Cancer Prevention Trials Unit, King's College, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1509-8744
Isaac ManyondaSt George's Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Katie Myers SmithWolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1837-3924
Queen Mary University of London · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GBUniversity of Edinburgh · GBKing's College London · GBSt George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of East Anglia · GBUniversity of Stirling · GBUNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

Cancer Research UK 25356Department of Health 15/57/85Medical Research Council MR/S037519/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nicotine replacement therapy, in the form of nicotine patches, is commonly offered to pregnant women who smoke to help them to stop smoking, but this approach has limited efficacy in this population. Electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) are also used by pregnant women who smoke but their safety and efficacy in pregnancy are unknown. Here, we report the results of a randomized controlled trial in 1,140 participants comparing refillable e-cigarettes with nicotine patches. Pregnant women who smoked were randomized to e-cigarettes (n = 569) or nicotine patches (n = 571). In the unadjusted analysis of the primary outcome, validated prolonged quit rates at the end of pregnancy in the two study arms were not significantly different (6.8% versus 4.4% in the e-cigarette and patch arms, respectively; relative risk (RR) = 1.55, 95%CI: 0.95-2.53, P = 0.08). However, some participants in the nicotine patch group also used e-cigarettes during the study. In a pre-specified sensitivity analysis excluding abstinent participants who used non-allocated products, e-cigarettes were more effective than patches (6.8% versus 3.6%; RR = 1.93, 95%CI: 1.14-3.26, P = 0.02). Safety outcomes included adverse events and maternal and birth outcomes. The safety profile was found to be similar for both study products, however, low birthweight (<2,500 g) was less frequent in the e-cigarette arm (14.8% versus 9.6%; RR = 0.65, 95%CI: 0.47-0.90, P = 0.01). Other adverse events and birth outcomes were similar in the two study arms. E-cigarettes might help women who are pregnant to stop smoking, and their safety for use in pregnancy is similar to that of nicotine patches. ISRCTN62025374.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsSmoking CessationFemaleHumansNicotinePregnancyTobacco Use Cessation DevicesNicotine

Identifiers

PMID35577966
PMCPMC9117131
OpenAlexW4280574087

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.