ArticlePhysiological reviews2022
Understanding COVID-19 susceptibility and presentation based on its underlying physiology.
Article in Physiological reviews, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sensing molecular carbon dioxide: a translational focus for respiratory disease.Physiological reviews · 2025Review
- Oxidative damage to lung mitochondrial DNA is a key contributor to the development of chemical lung injury.Redox biology · 2025Article
- The SARS-CoV-2 spike S1 protein induces global proteomic changes in ATII-like rat L2 cells that are attenuated by hyaluronan.American journal of physiology. Lung cellular and molecular physiology · 2023Article
- The oxygen dissociation curve of blood in COVID-19-An update.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Review
- Increased circulating microparticles contribute to severe infection and adverse outcomes of COVID-19 in patients with diabetes.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2022Article
- ARDS in the time of corona: context and perspective.American journal of physiology. Lung cellular and molecular physiology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.