Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35585276›Full record

ArticleMolecular and cellular biochemistry2022

Analysis of domain organization and functional signatures of trypanosomatid keIF4Gs.

Supratik Das

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular and cellular biochemistry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Supratik DasInfection and Immunology, Translational Health Science and Technology Institute, Faridabad, Haryana, 121001, India. supratik@thsti.res.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7279-938X
Translational Health Science and Technology Institute · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Translation initiation is the first step in three essential processes leading to protein synthesis. It is carried out by proteins called translation initiation factors and ribosomes on the mRNA. One of the critical translation initiation factors in eukaryotes is eIF4G which is a scaffold protein that helps assemble translation initiation complexes that carry out translation initiation which ultimately leads to polypeptide synthesis. Trypanosomatids are a large family of kinetoplastids, some of which are protozoan parasites that cause diseases in humans through transmission by vectors. While the protein translation mechanisms in eukaryotes and prokaryotes are well understood, the protein translation factors and mechanisms in trypanosomatids are poorly understood necessitating further studies. Unlike other eukaryotes, trypanosomatids contain five eIF4G orthologues with diversity in length and sequences. Here, I have used bioinformatics tools to look at trypanosomatid keIF4G orthologue sequences and report that there are similarities and considerable differences in their domains/motifs organization and signature amino acid sequences that are required for different functions as compared to human eIF4G. My analysis suggests that there is likely to be considerable diversity and complexity in trypanosomatid keIF4G functions as compared to other eukaryotes.

Indexed as

Eukaryotic Initiation Factor-4GProtein BiosynthesisAmino Acid SequenceHumansRNA, MessengerEukaryotic Initiation Factor-4GRNA, MessengerDomainseIF4GFunctional signaturesMotifsOrthologuesPathogenic protozoan parasitesTranslation initiationTrypanosomatids

Identifiers

PMID35585276
OpenAlexW4280553235

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.