Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35586101›Full record

ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2022

E-Commerce Fraud Detection Model by Computer Artificial Intelligence Data Mining.

JiaoLong Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

JiaoLong LiPurchasing Department, Sinosteel Xingtai Machinery & Mill Roll Co., Ltd., Xingtai 054000, Hebei, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8151-207X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aims to identify e-commerce fraud, solve the financial risks of e-commerce enterprises through big data mining (BDM), further explore more effective solutions through Information fusion technology (IFT), and create an e-commerce fraud detection model (FDM) based on IFT (namely, computer technology (CT), artificial intelligence (AI), and data mining (DM). Meanwhile, BDM technology, support vector machine (SVM), logistic regression model (LRM), and the proposed IFT-based FDM are comparatively employed to study e-commerce fraud risks deeply. Specifically, the LRM can effectively solve data classification problems. The proposed IFT-based FDM fuses different information sources. The experimental findings corroborate that the proposed Business-to-Business (B2B) e-commerce enterprises-oriented IFT-based FDM presents significantly higher fraud identification accuracy than SVM and LRM. Therefore, the IFT-based FDM is superior to SVM and LRM; it can process and calculate e-commerce enterprises' financial risk data from different sources and obtain higher accuracy. BDM technology provides an important research method for e-commerce fraud identification. The proposed e-commerce enterprise-oriented FDM based on IFT can correctly analyze enterprises' financial status and credit status, obtaining the probability of fraudulent behaviors. The results are of great significance to B2B e-commerce fraud identification and provide good technical support for promoting the healthy development of e-commerce.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceCommerceComputersData MiningFraud

Identifiers

PMID35586101
PMCPMC9110132

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.