ReviewFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2022
Myocardial Infarction With Non-obstructive Coronary Arteries: Risk Factors and Associated Comorbidities.
Review in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Randomized Controlled Trial of Internet-Delivered Cognitive Behavioral Therapy After Myocardial Infarction With Nonobstructive Coronary Arteries or Takotsubo Syndrome.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Trial
- Myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries and newly diagnosed cancer: is there a link? Case report.European heart journal. Case reports · 2026Article
- Early Cardiac Involvement in Treatment-Naïve, Autoantibody-Seropositive Patients with Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases in the Prodromal Phase-A Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Impact of sex on the outcome of troponin-positive patients with non-obstructive coronary arteries.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Antithrombotic drugs for acute coronary syndromes in women: sex-adjusted treatment and female representation in randomised clinical trials. A clinical consensus statement of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI) and the ESC Working Group on Thrombosis.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025Article
- Acute Coronary Syndrome and Rheumatic Disease.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Article
- Ejection Fraction-Related Differences of Baseline Characteristics and Outcomes in Troponin-Positive Patients without Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Diagnostic Puzzles and Cause-Targeted Treatment Strategies in Myocardial Infarction with Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries: An Updated Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Acute Myocardial Infarction in Patients with Hereditary Thrombophilia-A Focus on Factor V Leiden and Prothrombin G20210A.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Ischemia with Nonobstructive Coronary Artery Disease and Atrial Cardiomyopathy-Two Sides of the Same Story?Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- From multi-omics approaches to personalized medicine in myocardial infarction.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Review
- Relapsing Polychondritis-Associated Myocardial Infarction With Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries.Journal of investigative medicine high impact case reportsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA), despite a lower burden of coronary atherosclerosis, has a non-negligible prognostic impact. The label of MINOCA includes an array of different aetiologies and pathologic conditions, thus the identification of the underlying disease is crucial to patient management. Myocardial infarction with obstructive coronary artery disease and MINOCA share only some risk factors and comorbid conditions. While traditional cardiovascular risk factors have a lower prevalence in MINOCA patients, atypical ones-e.g., anxiety, depression, and autoimmune diseases-are much more frequent in this population. Other conditions-e.g., pregnancy, cancer, and anti-cancer therapy-can predispose to or even induce MINOCA through various mechanisms. The evidence of such risk factors for MINOCA is still scarce and contradicting, as no randomised controlled trials exist in this field. In our work, we performed a review of registries, clinical studies, and case reports of MINOCA, in order to summarise the available data and analyse its possibile pathogenic mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.