ArticleJournal of health monitoring2018
Ad hoc surveys at the Robert Koch Institute.
Article in Journal of health monitoring, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Socioeconomic barriers to healthcare cost-sharing in the Czech Republic: limited awareness and resistance.Health economics review · 2026Article
- Article
- Household income is associated with attack frequency, but not with the prevalence of headache: an analysis of self-reported headache in the general population in Germany.The journal of headache and pain · 2024Article
- Barriers and drivers to COVID-19 vaccination among the migrant and non-migrant population in Germany, 2021.European journal of public health · 2024Article
- Healthcare and health situation of adults with type 2 diabetes in Germany: The study GEDA 2021/2022-Diabetes.Journal of health monitoring · 2024Article
- [Parental strain, inattention/hyperactivity symptoms and parent-reported ADHD in children and adolescents: results of the KiGGS study].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2024Article
- Intersectional analysis of social disparities in type 2 diabetes risk among adults in Germany: results from a nationwide population-based survey.BMC public health · 2024Article
- What is the health status of girls and boys in the COVID-19 pandemic? Selected results of the KIDA study.Journal of health monitoring · 2023Article
- German Health Update (GEDA 2019/2020-EHIS) - Background and methodology.Journal of health monitoring · 2021Article
- Intention for Screening Colonoscopy among Previous Non-Participants: Results of a Representative Cross-Sectional Study in Germany.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Migraine and tension-type headache in Germany. Prevalence and disease severity from the BURDEN 2020 Burden of Disease Study.Journal of health monitoring · 2020Article
- [Health reporting as part of public health surveillance: the example of diabetes].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2020Review
- Health App Use and Its Correlates Among Individuals With and Without Type 2 Diabetes: Nationwide Population-Based Survey.JMIR diabetes · 2020Article
- Population-based food consumption survey as an additional tool for foodborne outbreak investigations, Germany, 2017.Epidemiology and infection · 2020Article
- Psychometric properties of a nationwide survey for adults with and without diabetes: the "disease knowledge and information needs - diabetes mellitus (2017)" survey.BMC public health · 2020Article
- First results from the study 'Disease knowledge and information needs - Diabetes mellitus (2017)'.Journal of health monitoring · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Robert Koch Institute (RKI) regularly conducts nationally representative cross-sectional studies (KiGGS, DEGS and GEDA) as part of the nationwide health monitoring system. In addition to these health surveys, data is collected in telephone interviews either on specific thematic fields (such as diabetes) or specific groups (such as medical staff) that were not or only insufficiently covered by the larger health surveys. As they are flexible and fast, ad hoc surveys conducted via telephone interviews can respond to specific epidemiological and health political questions. This article describes the procedures applied in ad hoc telephone interview surveys, which were newly introduced as a standardised method in 2017 and are applied by the Laboratory for Health Surveys at the RKI. The article presents the stages of project management such as concept development, establishment of a concept for data protection, questionnaire development, pre-test and field phase, calculation of weighting factors and provision of the final data set. The aim is to describe the process and shed light on the standardised procedures, the reported quality indicators and the breadth of possible scenarios of application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.