Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35588126›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

A scoping review of information provided within degenerative cervical myelopathy education resources: Towards enhancing shared decision making.

Rishi Umeria, Oliver Mowforth, Ben Grodzinski, Zahabiya Karimi, Iwan Sadler, Helen Wood, Irina Sangeorzan, Petrea Fagan, Rory Murphy, Angus McNair and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Understanding degenerative cervical myelopathy in musculoskeletal practice.The Journal of manual & manipulative therapy · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Rishi UmeriaDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, Division of Neurosurgery, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8918-152X
Oliver MowforthDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, Division of Neurosurgery, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6788-745X
Ben GrodzinskiDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, Division of Neurosurgery, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8839-4718
Zahabiya KarimiMyelopathy.org, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Iwan SadlerMyelopathy.org, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Helen WoodMyelopathy.org, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Irina SangeorzanMyelopathy.org, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Petrea FaganSchool of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Rory MurphyDepartment of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America.
Angus McNairCentre for Surgical Research, Bristol Medical School: Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Benjamin DaviesDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, Division of Neurosurgery, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
University of Cambridge · GBMyeloma UK · GBBarrow Neurological Institute · USUniversity of Bristol · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDegenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is a chronic neurological condition estimated to affect 1 in 50 adults. Due to its diverse impact, trajectory and management options, patient-centred care and shared decision making are essential. In this scoping review, we aim to explore whether information needs in DCM are currently being met in available DCM educational resources. This forms part of a larger Myelopathy.org project to promote shared decision making in DCM.

methodsA search was completed encompassing MEDLINE, Embase and grey literature. Resources relevant to DCM were compiled for analysis. Resources were grouped into 5 information types: scientific literature, videos, organisations, health education websites and patient information leaflets. Resources were then further arranged into a hierarchical framework of domains and subdomains, formed through inductive analysis. Frequency statistics were employed to capture relative popularity as a surrogate marker of potential significance.

resultsOf 2674 resources, 150 information resources addressing DCM were identified: 115 scientific literature resources, 28 videos, 5 resources from health organisations and 2 resources from health education websites. Surgical management was the domain with the largest number of resources (66.7%, 100/150). The domain with the second largest number of resources was clinical presentation and natural history (28.7%, 43/150). Most resources (83.3%, 125/150) were designed for professionals. A minority (11.3% 17/150) were written for a lay audience or for a combined audience (3.3%, 5/150).

conclusionEducational resources for DCM are largely directed at professionals and focus on surgical management. This is at odds with the needs of stakeholders in a lifelong condition that is often managed without surgery, highlighting an unmet educational need.

Indexed as

Decision Making, SharedSpinal Cord DiseasesHumansMEDLINEPatient-Centered Care

Identifiers

PMID35588126
PMCPMC9119544
OpenAlexW4280607571

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.