Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35589910›Full record

ArticleCognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience2022

Exploration heuristics decrease during youth.

Magda Dubois, Aislinn Bowler, Madeleine E Moses-Payne, Johanna Habicht, Rani Moran, Nikolaus Steinbeis, Tobias U Hauser

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Magda DuboisMax Planck UCL Centre for Computational Psychiatry and Ageing Research, WC1B 5EH, London, UK. magda.dubois.18@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-5396-1855
Aislinn BowlerMax Planck UCL Centre for Computational Psychiatry and Ageing Research, WC1B 5EH, London, UK.
Madeleine E Moses-PayneMax Planck UCL Centre for Computational Psychiatry and Ageing Research, WC1B 5EH, London, UK.
Johanna HabichtMax Planck UCL Centre for Computational Psychiatry and Ageing Research, WC1B 5EH, London, UK.
Rani MoranMax Planck UCL Centre for Computational Psychiatry and Ageing Research, WC1B 5EH, London, UK.
Nikolaus SteinbeisDivision of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, WC1H 0AP, London, UK.
Tobias U HauserMax Planck UCL Centre for Computational Psychiatry and Ageing Research, WC1B 5EH, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7997-8137

Funding

MRF_ MRF-160-0003-ELP-HAUSEWellcome Trust 203147/Z/16/ZWellcome Trust 211155/Z/18/BWellcome Trust 211155/Z/18/ZWellcome Trust 224051/Z/21
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deciding between exploring new avenues and exploiting known choices is central to learning, and this exploration-exploitation trade-off changes during development. Exploration is not a unitary concept, and humans deploy multiple distinct mechanisms, but little is known about their specific emergence during development. Using a previously validated task in adults, changes in exploration mechanisms were investigated between childhood (8-9 y/o, N = 26; 16 females), early (12-13 y/o, N = 38; 21 females), and late adolescence (16-17 y/o, N = 33; 19 females) in ethnically and socially diverse schools from disadvantaged areas. We find an increased usage of a computationally light exploration heuristic in younger groups, effectively accommodating their limited neurocognitive resources. Moreover, this heuristic was associated with self-reported, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder symptoms in this population-based sample. This study enriches our mechanistic understanding about how exploration strategies mature during development.

Indexed as

Attention Deficit Disorder with HyperactivityHeuristicsAdolescentAdultChildFemaleHumansLearningAdolescenceDecision-makingExplorationImpulsivity

Identifiers

PMID35589910
PMCPMC9458685

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.