Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35596104›Full record

Observational studyInternal and emergency medicine2022

Independent predictors of in-hospital mortality and the need for intensive care in hospitalized non-critical COVID-19 patients: a prospective cohort study.

Nursel Çalık Başaran, Murat Özdede, Oğuz Abdullah Uyaroğlu, Taha Koray Şahin, Berşan Özcan, Hakan Oral, Lale Özışık, Gülay Sain Güven, Mine Durusu Tanrıöver

Open access · bronzeAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Internal and emergency medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nursel Çalık BaşaranDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
Murat ÖzdedeDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey. muratozdede@hacettepe.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6981-1210
Oğuz Abdullah UyaroğluDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
Taha Koray ŞahinDepartment of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
Berşan ÖzcanDepartment of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
Hakan OralDepartment of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
Lale ÖzışıkDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
Gülay Sain GüvenDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
Mine Durusu TanrıöverDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
Hacettepe University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the most helpful strategies to deal with ongoing coronavirus pandemics is to use some prudence when treating patients infected with SARS-CoV-2. We aimed to evaluate the clinical, demographic, and laboratory parameters that might have predictive value for in-hospital mortality and the need for intensive care and build a model based on them. This study was a prospective, observational, single-center study including non-critical patients admitted to COVID-19 wards. Besides classical clinic-demographic features, basic laboratory parameters obtained on admission were tested, and then new models for each outcome were developed built on the most significant variables. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analyses were performed by calculating each model's probability. A total of 368 non-critical hospitalized patients were recruited, the need for ICU care was observed in 70 patients (19%). The total number of patients who died in either ICU or wards was 39 (10.6%). The first two models (based on clinical features and demographics) were developed to predict ICU and death, respectively; older age, male sex, active cancer, and low baseline saturation were noted to be independent predictors. The area under the curve values of the first two models were noted 0.878 and 0.882 (p < .001; confidence interval [CI] 95% [0.837-0.919], p < .001; CI 95% [0.844-0.922]). Following two models, the third and fourth were based on laboratory parameters with clinic-demographic features. Initial lower sodium and lower albumin levels were determined as independent factors in predicting the need for ICU care; higher blood urea nitrogen and lower albumin were independent factors in predicting in-hospital mortality. The area under the curve values of the third and fourth model was noted 0.938 and 0.929, respectively (p < .001; CI 95% [0.912-0.965], p < .001; CI 95% [0.895-962]). By integrating the widely available blood tests results with simple clinic demographic data, non-critical patients can be stratified according to their risk level. Such stratification is essential to filter the patients' non-critical underlying diseases and conditions that can obfuscate the physician's predictive capacity.

Indexed as

COVID-19Critical CareHospital MortalityAlbuminsHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesSARS-CoV-2AlbuminsAlbuminBlood urea nitrogenCOVID-19In-hospital mortalityIntensive care unitSARS-CoV-2Sodium

Identifiers

PMID35596104
PMCPMC9122556
OpenAlexW4281257408

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.